04/05/2001 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e Section 1145.04. 3) A 20' variance for landscaping buffer at east setback (residential district), (code requires 30', applicant shows 10'), Section 1145.04. 4) An 11' variance for parking setback from the residential district. (Code requires 30', applicant shows 19'), Section 1145.07. S) A variance not to install a 6' high solid fence at the residential district, Section 1145.07. 6) A 26' 6" variance for building setback (east) from a residential lot (code requires 100', applicant shows 73' 6"), Section 1145.07. 7) A 10° variance for landscaping buffer at the southwest property line. (Code requires 10', applicant shows 0'), Section 1145.04. 8) A 5' variance for parking setback at southwest property line (code requires 10', applicant shows 5'), Section 1145.07. 9) A variance to store miscellaneous equipment and material in an equipment yard which is not enclosed, Section 1145.09 (A). 10) A variance to have only 1 truck loading/unloading area. Code requires 2. Section 1161.13. 11) A variance to have only 1 access drive, code requires 2. Section 1161.10 (A). 12) A 2' variance for maxzmum width of access drive. Maximum allowed by code is 24', applicant shows 26'. Section 1161.10 (B). 13) A variance to have a 20' radius at the drive, code requires 25'. Section 1161.10 (B). 14) A variance to have 8 additional ground signs (code allows l, applicant shows 9). Section 1163.26. In addition to the above, they are creating the property at 31333 Industrial Pkwy. to need the following variances: 15) A 10' variance for landscaping buffer at the northeast property line (code requires 10', applicant shows 0'), Section 1145.04. 16) A 10' variance for paa-king setback at the northeast property line (code requires 10°, applicant shows 0'), Section 1145.07. 17) A variance to store miscellaneous equipment and material in an equipment yard which is not enclosed. Section 1145.09 (A). Chairman IVlaloney called all interested parties forward to review the proposal. T'he oath was administered to 'I'ony Cerny, the architect, and Jeff Hammerschmidt, the owner, who caine forward to review the proposal. 1VIr. 1VIaloney commented that they have a lot of variances requested here and requested that they explain these to the board. 1VIr. Cerny cornrnented that there were a few variances that he was not aware of on the agenda. They are trying to build a building that has the sarne appearance as the existing Fieldstone building. Initially they had intended to join the lots, which would eliminate a lot of these variances, but Mr. Hammerschmidt found problems so they are keeping the lots separate. When they talked to the Planning Commission, fhey seemed to understand or accept that. The first vaxiance is there because they just duplicated what they had done on the existing building and there were no problems at that time with doing this, The north property line has a 13 ft. jog were the property line jumps in towards the building itself. They are trying to maximize the use of the lot even though they have such an odd shaped lot. They wanted to simplify the rear ofr the building and keep it straight. Directly to the north of tlus is the C.E.I. easement, which is a couple hundred feet wide, so they aren't encroaching upon anybody when they do that. There is a small parcel directly to the east that is zoned residential, but it is actually part of the right of way for I-480. Their opinion is, even though it is zoned residential, it is bound by C.E.I. on one side and 480 on the other side is owned by the State. Variances 4 and 5 are associated with the same small parcel that is next to them. Mr. Gareau questioned if he was sure it was owned by O.D.O.T. Mr. Cerny replied that he made 5