06/12/2001 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e• green space. Mr. Zwick indicated that all the green shown on the plans were common area. 1VIr. Tallon read allowed the requirements from the city code. Mr. Zwick suggested that then the land in the back is available to be considered the green space. Mr. Tallon questioned if the correct units were shown on the site plan. IVIr. Zwick indicated that as none had been sold they were not sure which units would be built, but if only the largest unit is sold, they would still fit. He suggested that any request could be accommodated. Mr. Tallon questioned where the sidewalks would be located on the site. Mr. Zwick suggested that there are sidewalks on both sides of street which go to Cook Road, as indicated on the plans. Mr. Tallon voiced that the sidewalks stop at first unit. Mr. Zwick indicated that the sidewalks would go to Cook Road. Mr. Tallon questioned how the condominium owners would get to the common area. Mr. Zwick remarked that there was 100 feet between each set of units. Mr. Rymarczyk suggested that the additional ground sign might require variances. Mr. McDonough, the attorney indicated that he would like to address a few of the comments that were made. The land was in Olmsted Township and annexed to North Olmsted. The design is the same as the existing site on the north side of the road in Cinnamon Woods. Since there were 9(nine) phases approved for the Cinnamon Woods development the applicants do not understand why this should be any different. The streets are private streets the City will not be responsible for snowplowing or maintaining the streets themselves. The issue of street lighting, the owners will maintain the lights as per the agreement they sign when they first build their home with us. As far as the wattage of the lights themselves, the manufactures of the lights have recommendations as to what wattage should be used. The utilities concern from the engineering department will be addressed and shown on the plans. This exact proposal went before this board as Cinnamon Woods and was approved. Mr. Rymarczyk reviewed that the existing plans on file do not reflect the bump out on garages "nor" do the applicant's current plans show the bump out. He suggested that at one time, there was common parking in Cinnamon Woods and questioned if the common parking are at Cinnamon Woods was removed. W. McDonough indicated that each of the purchasers have many options that are available one which is the bump out. Ms. Becky from Hennie homes requested to see what Rymarczyk was requestina. 1VIs. Becky indicated that she would address the differences brought up with the engineer. R. Tallon motioned to table Hennie Homes Inc. of 264-07-025 (Cook Rd) until the next Planning Commission meeting. At which time the City Engineer will submit a report on the plans that have been submitted. The Planning Commission would like a report from the Safety director regarding the site and the Building Commissioner needs to approve the corrected plans. When the applicants return they are to include on the site plan buildings that meet today's codes, including parking requirements. The motion was seconded by K. O'Rourke and unanimously approved. Motion Carried. IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: 1. Kuan S Lee & Mei T. Lee Lot Split & Dedication Plat; 3478 Clague Road: The proposed splitting of permanent parcel number 231-25-010 at 3478 Clague Road to create a buildable lot on Beaumont Drive also requires the dedication of right-of-way on Beaumont drive. Improvements also need to be constructed (the water line, sewer lines, pavement and other utilities) to the new lot. The Lee's, in addition to a plat approval, want to 7