03/13/2001 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

? 'i currerit facility on the adjoining lot. -Chairman Koeth'called all interested parties forward to review the proposal. Tony Cerny, from Architectural Design Studios, Inc., came forward to review the proposal. Mr. Cerny commented that the building would be built in multi-phases (1-4) depending on the owner's ability to lease the space. The intent is to make this structure virtually identical to the building that is immediately adjacent to it. It will be slightly larger and they are trying to design the site plan so that the two buildings function together as opposed to apart from each other. Most of the variances needed are due to the fact that they have two lots that are sharing a common drive. They have a fenced in storage area which has some variances associated with it. Then they are asking for another variance along the back, which would be the north property line that abuts the C.E.I. property. Mr. Conway went over the variances they would be requesting. He then questioned if they ever showed a second unloading area. 1VIr. Cerny replied that if they combine the two properties, the area of the two buildings would fall in the requirements for two unloading zones. Mr. Conway replied they would still need a variance for that because they could still split the parcels in some point in time. W. Cerny replied that they covered that with an easement. Mr. Koeth questioned the lot coverage. W. Cerny replied that they are at a smaller percentage than the existing building on its lot. He thought they were at 34% lot coverage. Mr. Conway commented that they could have up to 40% lot coverage so they are under. Mrs. O'Rourke questioned the multiple tenant spaces. Mr. Cerny replied that the building, when completed, would be able to house up to 16 different tenants, but doubted there would be that many. Mr. Koeth questioned if the audience had any questions of concerns. No one came forward. R. Koeth motioned to move Fieldstone Development; S/L 11 Industrial Pkwy. to the Board of Zoning Appeals with a favorable recommendation of granted the requested variances. He then commented that he would like this proposal to come back to the Planning Commission afterward. The motion was seconded by T. Hreha and unanimously approved. Motion Carried 3/13/01. IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: V. CONIMLTNICATIONS: VI. CONIlVI[TTEE REPORTS: VII. MINOR CHANGES: VIII. NEW BUSINESS: R. Koeth motioned to change the meeting dates of Tuesday, May 8, 2001, which is an Election Day, to meet on Wednesday, May 9, 2001. Also there would be a regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday, -December, 26, 2001, which should be cancelled. S. Asseff seconded the motion and was unanimously approved. 5