Laserfiche WebLink
that they would not put up the awnings on the side how they are now, because they just do not feel <br />the need for them. The materials would be stucco to match the existing colors identically; colored <br />masonry to match the existing building; and columns will be red/pink masonry to match the <br />existing. There is a light gray masonry for the column bases. The columns project out slightly to <br />give the building more life. Mr. Liggett questioned what the reason was for having the sidewalk <br />down the side. Mr. Ogrinc indicated that the sidewalk is there to protect the building from cars <br />when they back out of the parking spaces and they do get a lot of pedestrian traffic from the <br />condos behind Kronheims. Mr. Liggett questioned how deep the sidewalk was. Mr. Ports replied <br />that it would extend the whole way along the side of the building and project outward 5 ft. from <br />the building. Mr. Liggett questioned if the Flanning Commission thought 5 ft. was necessary. The <br />reason he asked is because that end of the building looks quite plain and since there is no walkway <br />for people to walk under and since cars aren't parked up against it, it would be nice to get some <br />landscaping along that side. Just to break up the fagade and make it not look like the end of a <br />warehouse. Mr. Ports indicated that he would rather propose that they landscape the grass area <br />along Country Club. 1VYr. Zergott questioned if Developer's Diversified paid for the landscaping <br />down by the license bureau. Mr. Olsen indicated that it had to have been them. Mr. Zergott <br />indicated that he was just wonderinc,, because they shouldn't have. He suggested coming to him if <br />they ever have questions about their landscaping. Every tree that they, or whoever put out there is <br />probably going to die because it is a variety of tree that needs shade and it is out in the deep heat. <br />Already three-quarters of them are showing stress. He is not exactly sure why the board fence is <br />there because you can°t reach it with a car from either direction, backing or going forward. He <br />questioned if they are thinking of landscaping the grass area along Country Club to help break that <br />up a little more. Mr. Ports indicated that Developers Diversified thought it was fine the way it is <br />now, but if the board has some desire to add something then it could probably be accommodated. <br />Mr. Zergott recommended a tree line of some sort, they should do an inventory of what trees are <br />doing well in there so you don't have to introduce a new type of tree that you have to worry about <br />and drop one about every 25 ft. along Country Club. Mr. Yager indicated that he thought it was <br />nice to see Kronheims growing and expanding. The side fagade is pretty plain and they show these <br />grill things alona the existing side of the building and wondered, since they already own them why <br />not incorporate them back into the building. This would add some life to that side, and if they say <br />it is not necessary or you do not think it is effective, he is just wondering why that is a plain 292 ft. <br />fagade. The most important thing is to make sure that they have the appropriate interior space to <br />sell their product and make the best you can of the outside look on that fagade. Ms. Schulz <br />questioned why they where not incorporating the existing canopies along the side. Mr. Ports <br />indicated that there is a reasonable amount of traffic with Home Depot and other trucks getting <br />lost around the shopping center. Mr. Zergott questioned if he was saying that the canopies stick <br />out further than 5 ft. Mr. Ports replied no, he is not saying that. IVIr. Yager commented that from <br />the photo of the existing store side the canopies stick out further than the existing curb. If you put <br />the canopies back on that fagade, it would stay within the length of the curb. He did not see any <br />dents on these canopies, so history suggests that these trucks are not hitting them. Since they <br />already own these canopies, why not put the light back on that fagade to try to give it some more <br />life. Mr. Ports agreed. Mr. Yager indicated that they created a beautiful or at least effective <br />lighting scheme along all the entry facades, but don't show any lighting down the side. He wonders <br />if they should have any or if they did not want to draw attention to it, it is almost a developer <br />question more so than to the architect. Is it part of a system, or is it the backside even though it is <br />the front fa?ade to Country Club Blvd. He questioned what their thinking on that was. Mr. <br />Ogrinc replied that you usually look for the light to hit a focal point and they don't believe a focal <br />point is on the side of this building. Mr. Yager indicated that it would be nice to put four lights on <br />the pilasters around the sign on the south elevation of the building. Even though it is not an entry <br />2