Laserfiche WebLink
".,f - ' ti <br />that didn't happen. Mr. Liggett cotnmented that there is a simple place for them to go to that <br />complimented that rounded area and it is probably segmented, but it comes off as being a rounded <br />type of feature. The two additions that went on to St. Richard's Church compliment each other <br />well. The two wings that came off to the side, they're rounded metal roofs that just go up to the <br />corner. It is so elegantly done, but it is such a simple feature. 5omething like that could make this <br />all tie together.. Mr. Liggett indicated that it will be a nice structure, there's no doubt about that. It <br />is nicely done, but it just hasn't gone far enough yet and with the comments they've made they have <br />Diven enough recommendations that if they choose to go that route, the City is going to be happier <br />with it. Mr. Zergott questioned if this will go back to Planning Commission. Mr. Rymarczyk <br />replied that it has already been to Planning Commission and will not have to return. Mr. Zergott <br />explained that is the reason this board needs to make a decision or they put it back on Planning <br />Commission's docket. Mr. Liggett replied that he doesn't think that this board needs to solve their <br />problems. There are a lot of people who would be happy to see this go up and be done with. He <br />doesn't believe that this will be an eyesore. Ms. Schulz questioned how they would be accessing <br />the rooftop units. Mr. Bauschard replied that they would have to use ladders. They might be <br />putting a hatch in, but probably not. Ms. Schulz indicated that if it were her building she wouldn't <br />want people walking on the shingle roofs three or four times a year. Mr. Ligaett recommended <br />that they make some kind of motion. <br />T. Liggett motioned to approve Springvale Clubhouse addition of 5871 Canterbury Rd. with the <br />following recommendations: <br />1) The landscaping be reviewed by B. Zergott to incorporate more flowering towards more of the <br />middle part of the summer. <br />2) Using the new structure, compliment the barrel vault. Whether it be reconfiguring the pro shop <br />or main eating area structure. . <br />3) Resolve how the roofs connect to the existing toilet facility. <br />The motion was seconded by K. Schulz. Roll call on the motion; J. Nader, T. Liggett, and K. <br />Schulz, "yes". B. Zergott, "no". Motion Carried 8/9/01. <br />VI. ADJOURNMENT: <br />Chairman Zergott adjourned the meeting at 7:00pm. <br />a <br />1- Q <br />Brian Zergott, Chairman <br /> <br />Shaun Solomon, Asst. Clerk of Commissions <br />5