08/01/2002 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1. A 3 foot variance for side yard setback (code reguires 5 ft., applicant shows 2 ft.) 2. An 8 foot variance for rear yard setback (code requires 10 ft., applicant shows 2 ft.) Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (c)(2)). The motion was seconded by W. Kremzar and unanimously approved. Variances Granted. 6. Cind}r Hickman- 4475 Silverdale ()YRD-11 Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of installing a swimming pool. The following variance is requested: 1. A 301.3 square foot variance for accessory structures exceeding 20% rear yard coverage (code permits 950.4 square ft., applicant shows 1,251.7 square ft.). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1135.02 (d)(2)). . Chairman Maloney called. all interested .parties forward to review the request. Mrs. Hickman, and neighbors Gerald Martell, and Don and Karen Sikon, came forward to be sworn in. Mrs. Hickman indicated she would like to put in a 21 ft. round, above ground swimming pool in her yard. She said the variance has to do with her taking up more than 20% of her rear yard. Mr. Martell asked if she would be going back any further than she is right now. Mrs. Hickman replied she is not. Mr. Maloney pointed out she would be.12 ft. from the side lirie and 23 ft. from the rear line. She would be 10 ft. from the corner of her house. Mrs. Sergi pointed out it would be where the old pool was located. Mrs. Hickman said the new one would actually be more in the middl.e of the yard, which is a better location. Mrs. Sikon asked about fencing. Mrs. Hickman indicated she already has a 6 ft. privacy fence and locks and everything she needs. W. Kremzar made a motion to grant Cindy Hickman of 4475 Silverdale her request for variance (1123.12), which consists of installing a swimming pool and that the following variance be granted: l. A 301.3 square foot variance for accessory structures exceeding 20% rear yard coverage (code permits 950.4 square ft., applicant shows 1,251.7 square ft.). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1135.02 (d)(2)). The motion was seconded by N. Sergi and unanimously approved. Vareance Granted. T. Dennis Weber; 3384 West 231'` St. (WRI)-2) Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of addition to existing detached garage. The following variances are requested: A special permit to add to a non-conforming buiiding (1165.02). Note: Existing garage is 3 ft. from side yard setback, code requires 5 ft. 1. A 30 square foot variance for accessory structures exceeding 20% rear yard coverage (code pernvts 690 square ft., applicant shows 720 square ft.), section (1135.02 (d)(2)). 2. A variance for installing a gravel access driveway to new garage addition (code requires concrete or bituminous concrete pavement, applicant shows gravel), section (1163.11 (a)). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1165.02), (1135.02 (d)(2)), and (1163.11 (a)). Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. Dennis Weber came forward to be sworn in. Mr. Weber indicated he has an existing 1 car garage and he would like to add on a 2 car garaae to it. The problem is he is only 3 ft. off the side line and he needs to be 5 ft. He mentioned he has a vintage car that is stored in the 1 car garage and he needs to have a 2 car garage for his family cars. Mr. Kremzar asked if another variance would be needed for the extra one inch on the side yard., There was discussion about the total the applicant would need. Mr. Conway said it is an accessory structure, a detached garage, and he would not need another variance. Mr. Maloney pointed out the existing garage was already granted a variance and the 3 ft. was grand-fathered in before. He is 11 ft. off the other side so he is all right there. Mr. Maloney asked the applicant about the gravel. He 5