Laserfiche WebLink
some second floor numbers of 515 and 652. He indicated some of the numbers are close, such as 897 <br />on the Columbia lI, instead of 900. He said just about all of the second floor plans cause some <br />problems because they have chosen to have an open loft area. They could probably theoretically fill <br />that in with square footage if the board so chooses. He has a note that the Mastick I model, due to a <br />large front porch, does not meet the ininimum floor requirements. He said the porch takes out some of <br />the interior square footage and they do not count the porch areas. There are two other items not in the <br />letter. One is section 1136.08 which is improvements to conform requirements to the city engineer <br />and/or council for the construction material standard of pavement and utility installation. He will have <br />Mr. Griffith address that, but that is what gives them the power to enforce the engineering requirements <br />on private property. The other section that was not addressed the last time is section 1163.26 where it <br />indicates they shall be 75 feet from abutting residential properties. They are currently at 49 feet. They <br />split that access point on the road. They cannot get any farther away than 49 feet. That is not an issue <br />this board can address under the cluster category and make a recommendation on. It will have to go to <br />the Board of Zoning Appeals. He said as the board is aware, they have a lot more authority in a cluster <br />home development plan to go ahead and make a recommendation to Council, either for or against, <br />without the need to send a proposal to the Board of Zoning Appeals. If Council should find with you <br />then there is no variance required for the issues. When the city developed the cluster plan in 1991, they <br />had never done one. They took some outside advice and they wanted to leave the board some <br />flexibility so it could address some of these issues. As these things change and grow, when we get <br />down the road, we're going to see things that we don't see today so they tried to make the code as <br />flexible as possible to give the board the ability to review each development individually. Mr. Spalding <br />asked if the proposed units are one and a half story units or two story units. Mr. Conway replied they <br />have both. Mr. Spalding asked if the two story units require 900 square feet on the first floor, and the <br />second would require 900 also. Mr. Conway indicated that is correct. Mr. Spalding asked how close <br />any of the units come to that standard. Mr. Conway said the Columbia lI is 897 on the first floor, and <br />the second floor is 643 due to the loft area. Mr. Conway pointed out square footage does not include <br />the loft. The other unit is 732 square feet with a first option of 478 square feet and a second option of <br />622, so that one is significantly lower than the 900 requirement. The story and a half was 1,039 on the <br />Mastick I and 1,256. The one was about 100 square feet lower, and the other roughly 100 square feet <br />more. The second floor units were slightly under at 483, compared to 575. Mr. Spalding asked for <br />clarification on the loft areas. Mr. Conway confirmed it is not useable space and the board has the <br />option to say fill it in and make it 900 square feet, or the board can say it likes the ambiance of the plan <br />and go ahead. Mr. Conway said all the other models are variations of the Columbia. Mr. Corsi <br />confirmed that. Mr. Conway said there are basic first floor issues with the I and II, with slightly <br />different second floor levels. Mr. Spalding said the one and half story units have 1150 on the first floor <br />and 575 on the second. That would be 1725 in total. Mr. Conway confirmed that. Mr. Spalding asked <br />if these units have close to that amount. Mr. Conway said one is 1,039 on the first floor and 483 on the <br />second. The other is 1256 and again 483 on the second floor. Mr. Spalding pointed out they are both <br />less then. Mr. Hreha asked Mr. Corsi if they plan to build all of the units and then try to sell them, or <br />will they build different units as models and sell them. It appears that in certain areas, they can only put <br />certain square footage. He wondered if they will put up a few models and then let the market determine <br />how they build. Mr. Corsi indicated that is a correct assessment. They will first come out and build <br />models they believe the market will react to. The market will then tell them what they want and they <br />will go from there with the units. They will probably build a total of 4-5 units at any one time with at <br />least 2 of those being models and 3 being specs because it is their plan that they should be selling those <br />specs based off of their models. They will react to the market as to what units they end up building. <br />Mr. Griffith, the Assistant City Engineer, said to date they have not received calculations justifying the <br />size of the detention system. Mr. Hreha asked if the engineering department is indicating that, based on <br />the size as they know it, is it bigger than necessary or smaller. Mr. Griffith indicated they do not <br />speculate on such things. Mr. Conway said it is really not a Planning Commission issue. It is an <br />2