Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CITY ORTH OLMSTED <br />"TOGETHER WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!" <br />PLANNING COMIVIISSION <br />MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 10, 2002 <br />°HELD IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS <br />7:30 P.M. <br />I. ROLL CALL: Chairman Koeth called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. <br />PRE5ENT: Chairman R. Koeth and board members, C. Allan, K. O'Rourke, and W. Spalding <br />ABSENT: T. Hreha, and J. Lasko <br />_ ALSO PRESENT: Assistant Law Director: B. O'Malley, Assistant Building Commissioner: <br />T. Rymarczyk, City Engineer: P. Deichmann, Assistant Clerk of Commissions: A. Kilbane <br />II. REVIEW AND CORRECTION OF NLINUTES: The Planning Commission minutes from the July 30'h <br />special meeting have been submitted for approval. <br />R. Koeth made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. The motion was seconded by <br />W. Spalding and unanimously approved. <br />Mr. Koeth mentioned there will be a change in the agenda. They will begin with Linder & Associates, <br />continue with Speedway and Great Lakes Piano, and follow up with the Rockwynd subdivision. <br />Mr. O'Malley asked Chairman Koeth to make an announcement concerning the issue of four votes <br />required for passage of a proposal and the option an applicant has to withdraw from the agenda. Mr. <br />Koetb referred to the Planning Commission rules that indicate four.members constitute a quorum and a <br />favorable vote by at least four members is required for an official action. If the required vote cannot be <br />obtained, that matter shall be continued until the next regularly scheduled meeting. He mentioned that <br />an applicant has the choice to withdraw and come back when.the board has more members present. <br />III. BUII.,DING DEPARTMENT REQUESTS: <br />Linder & Associates (Water Tower Square)' 4998 Dover Center Road: <br />Proposal consists of replacing existing building with a new 6,090 square foot building. Note: Planning <br />Commission addressed this proposal June 25, and July 23, 2002. Board of Zoning Appeals granted the <br />required variances on July 10, 2002. The Architectural Review Board heard the proposal July 17, and <br />July 31, 2002. <br />Chairman Koeth called all interested parties forward to review the proposal. Mr. Davison, the project <br />architect, and Mr. Khouri representing Carnegie Management & Development, came forward to address <br />the board. Mr. Davison pointed out they were before the board a couple "of times previously. He <br />indicated they took the Planning Commission's comments and r.ecommendations and applied it to their <br />plan. They also went before the Architectural Review Board twice and they have adjusted the building <br />based on that board's comments. A major concern was the side of the building facing Dover Center <br />Road. They have made it look like the front of the building by adding glass, canopies, and extensive <br />landscaping on that side. He mentioned they received variances for the setback. They are 50-ft. back <br />fram the street but they have landscaped it heavily. Mr. Koeth asked if they have complied with the <br />lighting requests. Mr. Davison indicated they did submit a photometric and they made the necessary <br />change to the plan. They had.25-foot high poles to match the adjacent property but the recommendation <br />was made that they lower them to 20 feet, and they have done that. Mr. Davison said they tried to create <br />two "fronts" to the building, a front facing toward Water Tower and a front toward Dover Center. Mr. <br />Khouri pointed out they presented samples of the materials to be used to the Architectural Review Board <br />and they were approved. Mrs. O'Rourke asked if tlie service door would be painted the same color as the <br />brick. Mr. Davison indicated it will be the same color. She asked for confirmation that the light poles <br />will have a 3-foot base with a 17-foot pole. That was confirmed. Mr. Khouri reviewed the lighting plans <br />with Mr. Koeth. Mr. Spalding asked if they submitted the reciprocal easement proposals to the law