06/05/2003 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

extend a bedroom, bathroom, and existing kitchen. The board advised the applicant that the distance between the new addition and the garage would require a firewall, which would have to be approved by the Building Department. W. Kremzar motioned to approve Jacqueline Miller of 3161 W. 231 her request for variance (1123.12), which consists of an addition that requires a firewall and that the following variance is granted: A 12 foot variance for rear yard setback (new 12'g30' addition), (code requires 50', applicant shows 381). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.08 (a)). N. Sergi seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. Variance Granted. 3). Nancv & James Wagner, 5434 Decker Road, WRD 3 Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a swimming pool in rear yard. The following variance is requested: 1. A 380 square foot variance for rear yard lot coverage, (code permits 516 sq. ft., applicant shows 896 sq. ft.). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (d)(2)). Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review their request. Mr. Coughlin, with lighthouse pools and Mr. Nelson a neighbor each came forward to be sworn in and address the proposal. The applicant indicated that the owners would like a 15-foot pool in their backyard. It was stated that the owners of the parcel in question owned the vacant parcel next to the creak as well. The neighbor who was present after seeing where the pool would be placed indicated he had no problems with the request. The chairman read allowed a letter from a neighbor voicing the following concerns; 1) noise levels 2) size of pool verses lot 3) safety issues and 4) property values changing. The representative voiced that the neighbor submitting the letter lived across the street from the home. J. Konold motioned to grant Nancy & James Wagner of 5434 Decker Road their request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a swimming pool in rear yard and that the following variance is granted. A 380 square foot variance for rear yard lot coverage, (code permits 516 sq. ft., applicant shows 896 sq. ft.). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (d)(2)). W. Kremzar seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. Variance Granted. 4). James & Karvn Carlin, 3955 Lvdgate Drive, WRD 1 Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a new 4 foot fence. The following variance is requested: 1. A 30 foot 5 inch variance for side yard fence on corner lot (code permits 0, applicant shows 1) Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (f)(2)). Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review their request. Mr. Carlin the owner came forward to be sworn in and address his request. The applicant would like a fence for the safety of his child as well as keeping his dog in the yard. He felt the fence would not block the view of cars. Discussion as to what type of fence would be best took place and it was agreed that a picket fence would be best. The chairman requested that the fence be 3-feet in from the sidewalk. The applicant agreed to move the fence to 3-feet from the sidewalk. W. Kremzar motioned to grant James & Karyn Carlin of 3955 Lydgate Drive their request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a new 4-foot fence and that the following variance is granted as amended and agreed to. A variance to allow a 4-foot high fence to be 3-feet off the sidewalk and for the style of fence to be a picket, for side yard fence on corner lot (code permits 0, applicant shows 1). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (f)(2)). J. Maloney seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. Variance Granted 2