Laserfiche WebLink
Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward. Ms. Elaine Wesley, filling in for Mike Cristino, <br />came forward to be sworn in and address the request. There were no questions or comments froin the <br />board. <br />W. Kremzar made a motion to grant Cort Furniture, 4698 Great Northern Blvd., the request for variance <br />which consists of erecting a temporary 40'x60' tent from June 2, 2003 to June 9, 2003 and from <br />September 8, 2003 to September 15, 2003, and that the following variance be granted: <br />1. A variance for a 15 car parking reduction. <br />Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1161.05 (w)). The motion was seconded by N. Sergi and <br />unanimously approved. Variance Granted. <br />10). Motor Cars. 27500 Lorain Itoad WRD1 <br />Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of additional wall signage. <br />The following variance is requested: <br />1. A variance for 2 additional wall signs, (code permits l, applicant shows 3). <br />Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1163.27 (a)). <br />Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward. Mr. Lou Belknap of MC Signs came forward to <br />be sworn in and address the request. He said that Chrysler has asked all its dealerships to bring <br />showrooms and lots into compliance with its sign criteria. He said Motorcars is concerned because that <br />name does not tell anyone who they are. They are attempting to put the name on there and on the building <br />as well since they have such a deep set back. They would like people to be aware of their showroom back <br />there and the product line. There were concerns that when people go by they know it's a car dealer but <br />from what the owner says, many people believe it to be a used car lot. Mr. Kremzar pointed out you <br />cannot see the building anywhere from the street. He said there is already a sign on the post in front. Mr. <br />Belknap said they would change that sign. It will be a face change. Mr. Rymarczyk said it would not <br />require a variance because it is a face change. Mrs. Sergi said Motorcars will not be illuminated but she <br />asked if Chrysler and Jeep will be. Mr. Belknap said the Motorcars sign is existing now and he believes it <br />is illuminated. Mrs. Sergi said the plan shows it will be black with white outlines. Right now it is blue <br />and white. Mr. Belknap said the black is opaque and it has a white outline around it. Mrs. Sergi asked if <br />the sign will be changing. Mr. Belknap said if it is blue now they are probably just changing the face and <br />putting black on it with a white outline but it will still be illuminated. Mrs. Sergi said it has a flood light <br />now but the sign itself is not illuminated. She said what she is reading in the plans indicates the <br />"Chrysler" and "Jeep" will be illuminated. Mr. Belknap said that would be their intent. They have a <br />general layout and they have been taking down existing faces and redoing them. Mr. Maloney indicated <br />the board received a letter from a neighbor of Motorcars, David and Michelle Meadows. He then read the <br />letter (see attached). Mrs. Sergi asked what the hardship is if they are getting a sign by the street. Mr. <br />Belknap said he cannot say it's an extreme hardship other than the fact that people do not really realize it's <br />an actual showroom. Most people that go by get a sense it is a used car dealer. The applicant would like <br />to have the product line on the showroom. Mr. Kremzar said there is nothing on the sign that indicates <br />used or new. It is just a product name. Mr. Belknap said that is a different argument. Mr. Kelly said he <br />has noticed at the dealership that the left side is used cars and the right side contains new cars. Mr. <br />Belknap said he can only present what the dealership is telling him. <br />J. Konold made a motion to grarit Motor Cars, 27500 Lorain Road, its request for variance, which consists <br />of additional wall signage, and that the following variance be granted: <br />1. A variance for 2 additional wall signs, (code permits 1, applicant shows 3). <br />Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1163.27 (a)). The motion was seconded by N. Sergi. Roll <br />call on the motion: N. Sergi, W. Kremzar, T. Kelly - No, J. Konold, J. Maloney - Yes. Variance Denied. <br />Chairman Maloney said for the record no one showed up for case number 2 or 3. <br />7