My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/03/2003 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2003
>
2003 Board of Zoning Appeals
>
04/03/2003 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:49:14 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 6:27:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2003
Board Name
Board of Zoning Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
4/3/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />band area. The owner feels that the sign is not: too large. They believe that the sign will be an <br />improvement to the site. Mr. Harnick indicated that the "K" makes the signs square footage <br />seems larger than it really is. Mr. West indicated that they are requesting only one sign. Mrs. <br />Sergi questioned the size of the two sets of letters. Mr. Harnick commented that the side <br />letters would each be 14 1/2 inch high. Mr. Kelly voiced that the adjoining stores have smaller <br />signs and the applicant suggested that the corporate office wanted their signs to conform. The <br />city would also want the signs to conform. The City does not want to see signs larger than code <br />allows. He feels that the sign would over power the site. Mr. Kremzar questioned if the letters <br />need to be so big for being so close to the street. Mrs. Sergi questioned the hardship and what <br />size letters would be allowed on the sign, if built to code. Mr. Harnick indicated the hardship <br />is the sign is the corporate logo. He had not worked out what size letters would be allowed <br />following the code. Mr. O'Malley questioned if Mr. Rymarczyk knew if the sign would be to <br />code if the "K" were not so large. Mr. Rymarczyk indicated that he would need a firm <br />dimension as he would prefer not to scale, estimate or eyeball what may or may not be to code. <br />Mr. Harnick suggested it would be 3-feet high by 25-feet 11-inches. Mr. Rymarczyk <br />questioned if the applicants had a standard sign in a smaller dimension at any other store. He <br />further questioned if all the other stores had the same wording. Mr. West suggested that none <br />of their 75 other stores had smaller signs then this one. He also indicated that he knew of one <br />store that. only had Half Price Books on their sign. Mr. Rymarczyk suggested that if the <br />applicants only used Half Price Books the sign would conform to code. He also questioned what <br />would happen if the variance is not granted. Mr. Harnick .stated that is why we are before this <br />board we want a variance for the corporate logo. Mr. West indicated that is only one store that <br />has half price books only and the building is a lot smaller. Mr. Kremzar questioned if the <br />applicants need for a variance was due to the two existing signs. Mr. Rymarczyk indicated that <br />the reason the applicants require a variarice is for their sign only. Mr. O'Malley questioned <br />how tall the other letters in the other stores built are. Mrs. Sergi questioned if the smaller <br />letters were 12-inch instead of 14-inches and the large "K" was decreased in size if the sign <br />would meet the city code. Mr. Rymarczyk questioned how much neon signage would be used. <br />Mr. West suggested they would not use any more than what code allows. Mr. Kremzar <br />questioned if the applicants were sure they could not decrease the size of the sign. Mr. Harnick <br />answered no this is what we are requesting. <br />W. Kremzar motioned to grant Half Price Books of 4687 Great Northern Blvd their <br />request for variance (1123.12). Which consists of new signage and that the following <br />variance be granted: 1. A 23.67 square foot variance for a wall sign (code permits 80 sq. <br />ft., applicant shows 103.67 sq. ft.) Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1163.24 <br />(b)). J. Maloney seconded the motion, which was unanimously denied. Variance Denied <br />IV. ADJOURNMENT: <br />Chairman Maloney adjourned the meeting at 8:10 p.m. <br />F <br />Maloney, Chairman <br />Rote <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.