03/06/2003 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4. ? 1. An 816 square foot varianee for new accessory storage building (2% reae- yard) (code permits 684 sq. ft., applicant shows 1500 sq. ft.), section (1135.02 (d) (1)). 2. A 3 foot 4 inch variance for new accessory storage building (height) (code permits 12' ht., applicant shows 15' 4"), section (1135.02 (d) (3)). Note: The 2 existing sheds (10'x12' and.12'x12') in rear yard are to be removed within 30 days of completion of the new 30x50 accessory storage building. Which is in violatiom of Ord. 90-125 sections (1135.02 (d) (1)), and (1135.02 (d) (3)). J. Konold seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. Variances Granted 2). I)onald Janos, 23460 Stonevbrook Drive - WARI) 2: 'Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a new deck along side of pool. The following variance is requested: 1. A 19 square foot variance for new deck in rear yard (code requires 537 sq. ft., applicant shows 556 sq. ft.). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (d)(2)). Vice Chairman Kremzar called all interested parties forward to review their request. Mr. Janos the owner came forward to be sworn in and review his proposal. Mr. Janos voiced that he would like to place a deck on the side of the pool and questioned if the steps were part of the total calculations. Mr. laymarczyk reminded the applicant that he had been informed that the stairs were part of the total calculations. J. Konold motioned to grant I)onald Janos of 23460 Stoneybrook I)rive his request for variance (1183.12). The proposal consists of a new deck along side of pool. The following variance is requested: 1. A 19 square foot variance for new deck in rear yard (code requires 537 sq. ft., applicant shows 556 sq. ft.). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 seetion (1135.02 (d)(2)). N. Sergi seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. Variance Granted 3). Daniel E 1Vlargulies (Peppea- Joe's Restaurant), 24532 Lorain Road - WARD 2: Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of parking and signage. The following variances are requested: 1. A 10 foot variance for rear yard set back for parking (code requires 15 ft., applicant shows 5 ft.), section (1139.07) table. 2. A 5 foot variance for west side yard set back for parking (code requires 1.0 ft., applicant shows 5 ft), section (1139.07) table. 3. A 5 foot variance for east side yard set back for parking (code requires 10 ft., applicant shows 5 ft.), section (1139.07) table. 4. A variance for two additional ground signs (code permits 1, applicant shows 3), section (1163.26 (a)). 5. A variance for ground signs (3) to be in the 35' triangle (code does not permit, applicant shows 3), section (1163.17(a)). 6. A 21 square foot variance for a 12' high ground sign (code permits 50 sq. ft., applicant shows 71 sq. ft.), section (1163.26 (c)). Note: Pending finalization of lot consolidation. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1139.07), (1163.26 (a)), (1163.17 (a)), and (1163.26 ' (c)) Vice Chairman Kremzar called all interested parties forward to review their request. Mr. Margulies the designer, Mr. George the owner and Mr. Milloy architect each came forward to be 2