Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Barnett from Linden Drive is concerned about buildings "C" and "D", being three stories. <br />They currently have privacy problems with the existing condominiums on the south side of <br />Brookpark Road. He would like a site study conducted to have an idea of what the site line to the <br />resident's backyards and homes will be. They are exposed to the high rise condominiums along <br />the south side of Brookpark Road and experience lewd comments now. The proposed buildings <br />will be even closer and our homes will be exposed even further. Mr. Lipcsey from Mitchell <br />Drive reiterated that it was very important to make sure everything the applicant promises is <br />submitted in writing. The current plans do not include detailed landscaping plans, photometric <br />plans, or complete elevation plans. These are needed to really understand what their intentions <br />are for this site. Mr. Skoulis requested Mr. Berryhill address the resident's questions. <br />Applicants response: <br />Mr. Berryhill reviewed that the rental prices of the apartments will be between $850.00 to <br />$1,300.00 a month. The apartments will be a loss to them they know that they will be subsidized <br />by the retail on the site. They fill that they can fill the 100 units easily with employees of the <br />retail shops. The possible tenants that they have spoken with are William Sonoma, Pottery Barn, <br />Birkenstock Sandals, Carmon Mitchell Restaurants, Bravo Restaurant, Star Bucks they are talking <br />to Boarders and Barns & Noble to lease the entire first floor of building "B". They believe that <br />Lakewood will not achieve their rezoning. This area is a super regional mall area, which the <br />clientele they are looking for gravitate to super regional mall areas such as this. However, they <br />can not get commitments from this type of clientele until they know the project will be approved. <br />Mrs. Hoff-Smith inquired as to what the leasing terms would be. Mr. Berryhill suggested that <br />the average lease is 5-years but they try to get a 10-year lease. Apartment leases are 6-month to <br />1-year. If the apartments do not work they can easily be converted into a condominium complex <br />and sold off. The chances of having second floor retail would be very remote they do not feel <br />second floor retail would work. <br />"NOTE DUE TO A TECHIaTICAL ElaROR THE NEXT SECTION OF THE MCINUTES <br />ARE TAKEN FROM THE CLERKS NOTES ONLY" <br />1VIrs. Seman requested the applicants' use the three outer buildings as Office-B-Type Use as <br />other cities have. The City is currently in a financial mess and retail does not generate enough tax <br />dollars to properly run the city. Mr. Berryhill suggested that he understood the issue of tax <br />revenue however there are currently two office buildings within North Olmsted and both of their <br />abatements end in 2004 so the city will see an increase in tax revenues. Mr. Nieberding from <br />Mitchell Drive felt that North Olmsted would not draw the type of tenants the applicants are <br />suggesting. The current area is not conducive to the market that is being shoved at us. He is <br />concerned that with such high-end stores the residents of North Olmsted would not be able to <br />afford what the stores have to offer. Mr. Koeth reminded the neighbors it was they who <br />requested an upscale development and an upscale area would draw clientele not only from North <br />Olmsted but from other communities as well. Councilman Miller remind everyone that it was <br />Carnegie Management who brought Water Tower Square to the city and assured all the residents <br />that they would only bring in upscale tenants to the site and never combine the small shops. <br />Carnegie even signed a written agreement stating they would never combine the stores and as you <br />can see that is exactly what they did. The Law Department had no choice but to rule that as the <br />promises were not made or written on a deed restriction the city could not kept them from <br />combining the spaces. Therefore, he strongly advises each committee request all promises spelled <br />out in writing on a deed restriction. The residential space requirements must be spelled out on a <br />deed restriction to make sure they can never be changed to another use. <br />7