04/08/2003 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Parcel Numbers 236-16-013 (0.26 acre), 236-16-014 (approximately 4.7 acres), 236-12- 004 (0.978 acre), and 236-12-012 (approgimately 0.5 acre) for the Greater Cleveland RTA Park-N-Ride. The consolidated parcel (6.44 acres) will then be split into two parcels. Parcel A will be conveyed to Greater Cleveland RTA and will be 6.072 acres. The City of North Olmsted will retain the ownership of Parcel B(0.368 acre) and grant an easement for ingress and egress to Greater Cleveland RTA. Parcel B is the NOMBL Lane drive. The location of the parcels is on the east side of Great Northern Blvd. and the south side of Kennedy Ridge Road. Zoning is B, Residence, Single for Permanent Parcel Numbers 236-16-013, 236-16-014 and the northern half of 236-12-004. Zoning is A, Residence, Single for Permanent Parcel Numbers 236-12-012 and the southern half of 236-12-004. Permanent Parcel Numbers 236-12-004, 236-16-013, and 236-16-014 are in the Public Facilities Overlay District. J. Lasko seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. V. COMMUNICATIONS: Ordinance No: 2003 - 36 An ordinance amending section 1123.13 of the North Olmsted Zoning Code, Entitled "Finality of Board's" to permit the City to seek appellate review of determinations made by the Board of Zoning Appeals. Mr. O'Malley indicated that he prepared a memo to explain that this ordinance would be best explained as an observation on the part of the sponsor. This is a procedural shortcoming within the city's code: In order for the city to preserve its right to. appeal, it needs to be established by ordinance. The ordinance is not intended, designed, or meant to insult or offend the Board of Zoning Appeals in any way. At their last meeting, he reviewed that this is just preserving an option for the city. W. Spalding motioned to approve Ordinance No: 2003 - 36, An ordinance amending section 1123.13 of the North Olmsted Zoning Code, Entitled "Finality of Board's" to permit the City to seek appellate review of determinations made by the Board of Zoning Appeals. S. Hoff-Smith seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. Memo from the Office of Commissions regarding 2003 budget Chairman Spalding indicated that although the commission did not get the total funds requested council did provide funds so that the Master Plan review could get started. Continued discussion of Master Plan Review: Mr. Lasko indicated that now the funds have been put in place a scope to address how things will be addressed should be drafted. Mr. O'Malley indicated that the amount of funds involved would again have the board working with council as issues of contracts, proposals and things of that nature will need to be addressed and should be deferred to the law director. The board can prioritize what needs to be addressed by the consultant. Ideally, concrete solutions should be put into place with this review. With this budget, there is not enough money to have a consultant along for the entire process. Mrs. O'Rourke questioned if the county would work free. Mr. O'Malley suggested inviting the County back to let them 7