05/20/2004 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

standing water at the property line of resident's homes and developers land. Mr. Barnett voiced those residents along Linda Drive like the move back to having two-story -buildings and no above ground garage. The current plans address noise, lights, color and placing the 8- foot mounds and 8-foot fences that the residents asked for. Mr. Khouri said it was not their intent to hide anything that was discussed with the residents and they will follow the Foresters request as well as address the engineering issues. Mr. Yager voiced that residents should include or go through the City Planner to set up any meetings with the applicant so that the City can be involved with all aspects of the plans. It was pointed out that part of the second floor on building D would be a fake fagade with no use. Mr. Berryhill stated that Target was the driving force behind the entire plan and they need to close with the owners by June 30, 2004 or the development plan could not take place. J. Lasko moved that any and all actions the Planning Commission makes tonight will incorporate by reference and incorporate any and all conditions that Council has made in connection with their approval of the preliminary plan as they considered the mater on Tuesday, May 18, 2004. W. Spalding seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. Chairman Koeth announced that Carnegie Management & Development Corporation, Parcel- E's new preliminarily approved plans submitted would move to the Board of Zoning Appeals and that the new plans supercedes the previous plans Planning Commission submitted to the Board of Zoning Appeals for granting massing and other variances. R. Koeth moved to recommend that the Board of Zoning Appeals renew and reissue the building massing variance which was previously granted to the Target store based upon the same conditions and approvals that were previously imposed. J. Lasko seconded the motion which was unanimously denied. Comments during roll call: J. Lasko; for reasons mentioned during discussions primarily having to do with the inherent changes and nature of the development of Parcel-E "no". W. Spalding concurs with Mr. Lasko relative to massing based on the change in the development plans presented tonight. J. Lasko move that in connection to the mix-use D classification the proposed land use mix is 75.7% retail, 20.8% office and 3.5% Community Center which requires a variance because proposed use is in ezcess of 50% gross floor area used as retail. Planning Commission recommend that the variance lbe granted. W. Spalding seconded the motion which was unanimously denied. J. Lasko moved that Planning Commission recommend that the required number of parking spaces which could be incorporated into a landbank use be permitted and recommend that the Board of Zoning Appeals grant the variance for what ever the net additional parking spaces short of compliance of the code total be granted. W. Spalding seconded the motion, roll call on the motion; R. Koeth, W. Spalding, T. Hreha, and M. Yager, "Yes" and J. Lasko "no". Motion passed R. Koeth moved that the Board of Zoning Appeals grant the variance for the required front yard setback. J. Lasko seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. 4