01/27/2004 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

northwest of Bradley Road. Zoning for the portion of Permanent Parcel Number 233-07-009 within 200 feet of the right of way line of Barton Road is B Residence, Single. Zoning for the portion of permanent parcel Number 233-07-009 from 200 feet to 550 feet from the right of way line of Barton Road is Residence, Multiple. Zoning for the remaining portion of Permanent Parcel Number 233-07-009 furthest from Barton Road is Limited Industry, Industrial Park. The existing parcel has split zoning. The two proposed parcels, 70 feet by 155 feet, fronting Bradley Road, will conform to the area, depth and lot width requirements of the Zoning Code. These parcels will lie wholly within the B Residence, Single Zone. The remaining portion of Permanent Parcel Number 233-07-009 will conform to the area, depth and lot width requirements of the Zoning Code. Anplacant's Fresentation - Mr. Joe Ui-banick was present to address the Commission. He said they propose to build homes on two of the three parcels. There are three zonings currently for the property. He said there is only about 25 feet at the back end of the property by about 200 feet that is zoned industrial. Department Reports - Ms. Wenger indicated the plan has been modified from the original submission to meet the frontage t-equirements along Barton Road. Mr. Durbin said the plan is acceptable to the Engineering Department. Mr. Rymarczyk briefly explained the light industry zoning. Mr. O'Malley said the issue is the lot split. The applicant wants to carve out two residential lots and the balance is not for the Planning Commission to consider tonight. Commission Comments/Questions - Mr. Koeth pointed out that a portion of the parcel has been zoned light industry for some time. Mr. Lasko said the documents reflect there is one parcel that has three types of zonin;. Mr. Yager said it is an un-buildable site without rezoning. He suggested they review the zoning map. Audience Participation - Ms. Kathleen Hohf came forward to express concern about the light industry zoning. She is also woi-i-ied about the idea of a parking lot going in and the lights that go with it. Ms. Mary Bacik asked for clarification on the notification process and wanted to know what will happen with the rest of the land. She was informed that the Commission is not addressing plans for the third parcel and the notification process was reviewed. Ms. Marlene Boyle mentioned the surveyor that was on private property. He was quite rude to residents and she wants it on the record. The applicant and the audience members reviewed the zoning map and discussed their concerns. J. Lasko made a motion on the lot split plan for Barton Road permanent parce1233-07- 009, a proposal to split the p1i•cel of lpproximately 4.66 acres to be made into three parcels. Two parcels will have an area of 70 feet by 155 feet to be created fronting Barton Roaai, having an area of approximately .2491 acres and that the remainder of the sub-permanent parcel then be comprised of approximately 4.1755 acres with frontage on Barton Road of approxianately 100 feet. The motion was seconded by M. Yager was and unanimously approved. V. COMMUNICATIONS: Commissioners need to work on settinc, a budget for 2004 - Mr. Koeth pointed out a budget has already been submitted by the Office of Commissions on behalf of the Planning Commission. Mr. Hreha commented that some developers have had the insight to contact residents on their own and it has usually smoothed the process. They now have a catalyst in Ms. Wenger who brought Ganley and the neighboi-s together. Mr. O'Malley said there is a checklist that contains elements of Chapter 1126 that perhaps can be resurrected for Planning Commission review. It can be a guideline of some of the adverse impacts that are within the scope of the Commission's review of a typical development plan. Ms. Wenger mentioned the minutes will be streamlined in the future. The Commission will receive a condensed version of the 4