My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01/27/2004 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2004
>
2004 Planning Commission
>
01/27/2004 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:49:33 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 8:13:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2004
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
1/27/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. <br />contingent on the rezoning of the property. Mr. Rymarczyk said there is currently one <br />variance required as a result of the rezoning request. <br />Applicant's Presentation - Mr. Jordan Burns, the attorney for Ganley, indicated they are <br />seeking unified zoning and they anticipate it can happen now without a variance. The plan <br />has been revised to eliminate the need for a variance. He thanked the planning department <br />and the residents for the input provided at their meeting. Mr. Jerry Herschman, the architect <br />on the project, reviewed the new plan including the materials to be used and the layout of the <br />site. They have received favorable reviews from the neighbors who will benefit from the <br />project. He explained where the fence will be placed and indicated the landscaping will <br />extend the neighbors' yards 20 feet. The question of the cut-off lighting was solved since <br />they found the fixture they needed. <br />Commission Comments/Questions - Nlr. Yager applauded the relationship between the <br />Planning Director, the applicant, and the residents. He asked that the applicant ensure there <br />are no visible mechanical units on the site. Mrs. Hoff-Smith inquired about the lighting <br />situation. Mr. Herschman reviewed the plan. Mr. Rymarczyk said the applicant is still slated <br />to go before the Board of Zoning Appeals. If they wish to be removed from the agenda, he <br />will need documentation from the applicant. Mr. Herschman said he will take care of it. <br />Audience Participation - Mr. Paul Epple expressed concern about trees, buffering, and <br />access on the north side. He suegested Ganley continue the fence and landscaping on the <br />north side. Mr. Bruce Bruehler indicated he was not notified about the meeting that took <br />place. He is concerned about the noise, which is already bad, and property values. <br />Commercial property owners should have to abide by the zoning code. Mr. Steve Calmer <br />said he is concerned about commercial encroachment and decreasing property values. <br />Final Comments - Mrs. Hoff-Smith indicated the property values will not be adversely <br />affected, if anything they will be enhanced because the homes will be more protected. Mr. <br />O'Malley provided clarification on the notification process. Ms. Wenger indicated the <br />meeting between Ganley and the residents involved only those residents on the western <br />property line and it was to address specific concerns. The Planning Commission is always <br />concerned about the residents and about property values. They came up with very clear <br />solutions to the concerns that were expressed. Ganley has also said they will provide the <br />same buffering on the northern edge should that area develop. Ms. Wenger said she would <br />recommend the Commission act on the rezoning before proceeding with the development <br />plan. It will give the applicant the time to ensure the lighting and details of the landscaping <br />and fencing have been dealt with. Mr. O'Malley recommended that the Commission hold off <br />on the developinent plan and tlle lot split and consolidation plat until the rezoning is <br />finalized. Discussion ensued aboLit how to proceed and whether a contingent approval can <br />be granted. Mr. O'Malley indicated it could work for the development plan but he would <br />withhold approval of the lot consolidation at this point. Mrs. Hoff-Smith suggested the <br />applicant talk with more of the residents and make sure the fence is consistent. <br />J. Lasko made a motion to approve the rezoning for 25600 Lorain Road. 'I'he proposai <br />is to rezone the rear (north) poi-tion of Permanent Parcel Numbers 232-34-011, 232-34- <br />012, 232-34-013, 232-34-014, and 232-34-015 from B, Residence, Single to laetail <br />Business, General. The moteon was seconded by M. Yager and was unanimously <br />approved. <br />3. Lot Split Plat for Barton Road Ferinanent Parcel Number 233-07-009 (WRD 3) <br />The proposal is to split Permanent Parcel Number 233-07-009 (approximately 4.66 acres) <br />into three parcels. Two parcels, 70 feet by 155 feet, will be created fronting Barton Road. <br />Each of these parcels will have an area of 0.2491 acre. The remainder of Permanent parcel <br />Number 233-07-009 will be 4.1755 acres, with a frontage on Barton Road of approximately <br />100 feet. The location is on the soutli side of Barton Road approximately 1,500 feet <br />? <br />?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.