My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/14/2004 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2004
>
2004 Planning Commission
>
12/14/2004 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:49:34 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 8:15:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2004
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
12/14/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
surrounded by traffic from Brookpark and Lorain Roads, and does not lend itself to a safe or <br />enjoyable outdoor seating environment. She believes that the applicant has done all that was <br />reasonably requested by the Planning Commission, and recommends approval. Mr. Priscak with <br />Rosati's Custard came forward to review the proposal. The landscaping has been added to the <br />cooler and dumpster area and they will irrigate the proposed landscaping. Seating was removed <br />for safety reasons. Mr. Koeth thanked the applicant for working with Planning Commission and <br />making the changes requested. <br />R. Koeth moved to approve Rosati's Custard of 26261 Lorain Road their proposal which <br />consists of minor exterior modifications and site improvements. C. Allan seconded the <br />motion, which was unanimously approved. <br />Shadow Wood (Bradley Road Cluster), 30898 Bradlev Road (WRD 3) <br />Proposal consists of the construction of a single family cluster home development. Note: The <br />Architectural Review Board addressed this proposal on 7/21/04 and 9/22/04. The Planning <br />Commission tabled the proposal on 9/28/04. <br />Chairman Koeth called all interested parties forward to review the request and asked for the <br />department reports. Planning Director Wenger reviewed that Planning Commission previously <br />approved the applicant's request to rezone their property from light industrial to single family <br />cluster pending approval of the development. The applicant submitted development plans in <br />July and were tabled by the Architectural Review Board. Between July and September, the <br />applicants made significant progress on the design elements after meeting with city staff and <br />architects. After reviewing the plans at the September meeting, Planning Commissions tabled <br />the proposal. The applicant has been trying to solve issues with the City since then. <br />Zoning: Current zoning is split between limited industry and a small portion of multiple family <br />residences. The project will require rezoning of the industry portion to single family cluster, <br />which has been recommended by the Planning Commission for approval. The resulting plan <br />consists of 52 units, single family cluster development with a mix of detached and attached units <br />on a 9.36 acre site. <br />Elevations: Although they were previously reviewed, they were not submitted in time. Before <br />reaching Planning Commission, the various elevations were reviewed and had been significantly <br />modified. At the September meeting, Planning Commission had not required elevation changes. <br />Landscaping & Screening: Landscape plans were previously reviewed, however, were not <br />received in time by the deadline. The site plans identify proposed landscape buffer areas. <br />Previous landscape plans also showed planting areas at the entry and in various areas throughout <br />the development. <br />Traffic Impact: The applicant submitted a traffic study which included trip generation figures <br />and a level-of-service analysis. Their findings were that the development would not significantly <br />impact existing levels of service at the Barton/Bradley intersection and that a traffic signal was <br />not warranted at this location again. The Commission questioned this study and requested the <br />traffic consultant to review the intersection. The consultant indicated they would take a peak- <br />hour traffic count at the intersection to ensure their data was current. The revised analysis <br />showed that a signal is warranted for the intersection. However, it is important to note that this is <br />due mostly to existing traffic and not the impact of the development. <br />Access, Circulation & Parking: The applicant modified the site plans to show visitor parking <br />(previously shown as land banked) at various locations throughout the development. <br />Handicapped parking is also shown. Plans also show two locations for connections to a possible <br />future expansion area. Should the area ever develop, it will promote internal circulation. <br />3
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.