My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/14/2004 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2004
>
2004 Planning Commission
>
12/14/2004 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:49:34 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 8:15:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2004
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
12/14/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? y for planning for potential growth. Mr. Yager asked the Chief the reason why would they not <br />want to build further east for better response time as there are more residents there. The Chief <br />indicated with the set up that is planned, it would afford the best coverage of the city. <br />Mr. Yager questioned how the determination of the size of the site was made. Chief Klecan said <br />the station #2 is 3,000 square feet and they have outgrown the building. Property #1 has more <br />than ample property for a fire house and there is additional property for green space and future <br />expansion and training facility. Chairman Koeth, being on the Landmarks Commission as well, <br />said the home on Property #1 is the oldest home in North Olmsted. It is a Davis Johnson Stern <br />home and was built in 1831 and should be taken into consideration. We should look at <br />preserving the home and moving it further to the rear of the site. Also, being that the Metroparks <br />owns the land next to it, the home may be moved there. Mrs. Hoff-Smith asked how many <br />homes would be impacted by Property #1. Chief Klecan indicated it would be two or three. <br />Mr. O'Malley inquired about the lot size most desired. Chief Klecan indicated a lot 220 by 450 <br />feet deep would be most appropriate. <br />Mr. Lasko inquired if there was a property available towards the eastern end of town, taking into <br />account that it is easier for emergency vehicles to travel east to west, rather than west to east. If <br />a commercial development gets put in on the west, any risk would most likely be property value <br />rather than lives. Two locations that could be considered are Sterns Plaza and Hennie Plaza. If <br />they would look at compiling properties, they would let GIS survey identify which would be the <br />best opportunity in regard to response time. <br />Mr. Barlcer, who is a member of Landmarks Commission voiced his concern about the number <br />of historic homes being demolished. RTA demolished a Kennedy Ridge home to build a park <br />and ride. Three homes on Butternut Ridge were destroyed due to the new library. He said <br />slowly but surely the historical sites are being demolished. He asked that the City and Fire <br />Department be prudent in trying to save the home if Property #1 is chosen. Mr. Yager asked if <br />the Stern's home could be moved into the Metroparks. Mr. Barker said there are a lot of <br />historical homes near the bottom of Cedar Point Hill. He said if the building could be moved <br />down the hill, he feels it could mean a lot to the community. <br />Chief Klecan said he is in support of Mr. Barker proposes and looks at this as a win/win <br />situation. Being that this is a city building and when the city gains control of the property, there <br />is not a third party trying to push their special interest as far as the final outcome. He further <br />stated they are trying to do what is best for the community. Mrs. Hoff-Smith asked Mr. Barker if <br />the property owner knew that this is the site that they are most interested in. Mr. Barker said <br />they have not spolcen to the property owner. <br />Mr. Tim Roche, with Realty One office, came forward and represents another property on the <br />west end that is also historic. He said this property has 250 frontage feet and 3.94 acres of land. <br />There is no plaque on the home presently. This property goes back 750 feet. Moving the home <br />to the back of the property and allow 250 frontage. A shopping center is on the west, a school is <br />on the property in the rear, and a bungalow rental property is on the east. He feels it would be a <br />perfect location and accomplish two things, those being Landmarks, and the property to take it <br />to. The cost of moving a home back in 1997 was $25,000. <br />Ms. Wenger informed the Planning Commission that a piece of legislation is being introduced <br />next week to City Council that will authorize the administration and law department to begin <br />negotiations for land acquisition. It will be sent to committee for review. At that point, they will <br />consider all Planning Commission recommendations and comments. She encouraged the <br />Coinmission to consider all options and eliminate those that would not be suitable. Mr. <br />9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.