Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Crook asked if the applicant brought in a floor plan, he stated he did not. He asked if the <br />in/out drop off service area could be relocated. He wanted the add-on to be more appropriately <br />located with the building itself. Although this was previously discussed, the applicant said that <br />they cannot do that due to the internal circulation of the sales customers and the service <br />customers, and also this would create blockage of the truclc route. <br />Planning Director Wenger read several landscaping comments that Brian Zergott suggested: <br />1) Requested junipers be put in beds, mounted 6-8". <br />2) More diversity of plant materials including spirea, barberry and taxis <br />3) Ensure salt tolerant plants <br />4) Plant arborvitae screen inside the fenced area on the northeast side adjacent to the <br />residential area. <br />5) Inquired if trees could be planted in the grass area to provide additional screening for the <br />dumpster. The applicant stated the fence goes all the way across and ties into building. Ms. <br />Wenger asked if the grassy area could be extended. The applicant stated yes. <br />6) Recommended versalock wall system in a red charcoal blend, rather than 4" river rock. <br />7) Suggested that higher plants away from the glass would add more dimension. <br />Mr. Crook asked if the street front area could be softened by adding more trees to the radius, <br />creating more buffer in the front where the two honey locust trees will be located. <br />Furthermore, Mr. Crook asked if on the north side of the building to the drive aisle, if they <br />could plant a 3' wide buffer planter with evergreens in an effort to soften the service drop off. <br />Mr. Halleen thought the smaller plants will get beat up with snow plows. Mr. Crook asked if <br />the fencing could continue on the back of the property to offer more security. The applicant <br />stated it is on the back already. <br />Ron Kula, Kia manager, expressed frustration that the City offered different directions during <br />informal meetings. He felt the City was blindsiding them with too many different opinions, <br />and felt it was causing delay in the process. Mr. Crook said that the applicant has been offered <br />various design suggestions by individuals but felt everyone's goal was to create the best <br />design. <br />Ms. Wenger felt the current design does not make much sense and also feels the applicant has <br />tried to implement too many different recommendations from too many individuals. She also <br />lilces the idea of the glass centerpiece without making it look too contemporary. The applicant <br />likes having two story glass in the center as it would show off the inside of the building. Mr. <br />Crook said he likes the matching brick and the soldier course and cornice. He said the arch <br />looks fine, but does not think the left and right side tie in together, except for the brick. He felt <br />carrying the diamond pattern throughout is a great feature. <br />He suggested getting rid of the smaller arch and moving the brick pilaster and raised cornice to <br />the big arch, making it the main center focus element. Instead of the cornice being <br />continuously straight, it would pop up at the arch with pilasters being on the left and right. He <br />wants the whole storefront to take on a more fluid effect from the west to the east side by being