My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/21/2004 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2004
>
2004 Architectural Review Board
>
04/21/2004 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:49:35 PM
Creation date
1/28/2019 8:22:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2004
Board Name
Architectural Review Board
Document Name
Minutes
Date
4/21/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a. . . • <br />General Site• <br />7. Circulation at the main interior intersection will be addressed so that there will <br />not be access upon entering the site down the first parking aisle on the east <br />closest to Building B. <br />8. The curb cut on the southwest side of building D is to be removed and <br />additional landscaping used to replace the drive. <br />9. All landscaping will be readdressed including proper landscapiaig plans and <br />presented to Planning Commission for review. <br />10. The tree survey is to be completed and presented to the Planning Director. <br />11. The height of the mound and fencing along the property lines are to coincide <br />with the tree survey to determine height and location. All mounding <br />throughout the site should ungulate between six and eight feet depending on the <br />tree survey and the fencing is to be 6-feet high vinyl natural colored fencing (not <br />white). The goal of the six to eight foot differences is to preserve the existing <br />mature trees on the site. Mature trees will buffer the neighbors far more than <br />mounding and fences. <br />12. New lighting/photometric plans are to be submitted to Planning Commission <br />and will meet city codes and not require any variances. <br />13. All the above contingencies are to be presented on new plans and submitted to <br />the Planning Director prior to final approval. <br />B. Zergott seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. <br />Note: Board members felt that while the current plans are not 100 percent reflective of the <br />preliminary drawings, the design represents an improvement over the original concept. The <br />design is high quality and will stand the test of time more so than the original concept. The <br />board prefers the current design as it relates to the development plan. <br />VI. ADJOURNMENT: <br />Chairman Zergott moved to adjourn the meeting and excuse the absence of Board <br />member J. Nader. J. Crook seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. <br />Meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m. <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.