Laserfiche WebLink
`?... .? . <br />- > <br />VI. COMNIITTEE REPORTS: <br />VII. OLD BUSINESS: <br />Halleen KIA Certificate of Appropriateness <br />Landmarks discussed extension of time, reuse of the buildings by the owner, moving the <br />buildings and financial donations from the owner to move the building. It was voiced that the <br />owner would be willing to donate funds equal to what it would cost him to raise the buildings to <br />the City or Landmarks to help offset the cost of moving the structure. Estimated costs to remove <br />the building range between $7,500 to 11,000. The commission felt that from a historical <br />perspective the best use would be to remain on the current site and reused. Once a historical <br />structure is moved from its original site the structure somewhat loses its historical value. Mr. <br />Farrell voiced that they felt past meetings regarding the parcel in question determined that the <br />area was not in the historical district, now it is and his client is held to a 6-month restriction. He <br />believed that his client determined that it was not cost efficient to refurbish the building <br />therefore, it is not in his plans to keep the buildings. The commission questioned if the city <br />offered the owner incentives to reuse the building such as 20% tax credit for restoration of the <br />building if listed with National Register. Alternatively, local tax abatements available threw the <br />City itself for the building. Mr. Farrell reviewed that the owner does not think the funds are <br />sufficient to warrant reuse of the building. The Chairman indicated that the Ohio Historical <br />Society and National Trust informed him that there are no funds available for 2004 to assist the <br />commission or the owner. The applicants representative was asked if the owner would support <br />Landmarks efforts to have the building or its location recognized by the Ohio Historical Society <br />as a Historical site and permit a historical marker being placed on the site. Mr. Farrell was not <br />sure. At this point in the meeting, Mr. Halleen and Mr. Kula arrived at 7:30 p.m. as was noted <br />on the agenda. Chairman Lang questioned if Mr. Halleen would permit a historical marker at the <br />site. <br />Note: Landmarks Commission took a 20-minute break at this point in the meeting. <br />Mr. Farrell indicated that when and if the demolition permit is pulled he would notify Landmarks <br />Commission of his client's intent. However, there is not a specified date for the demolition to <br />take place. His client will keep Landmarks up to date as to what is taking place and Landmarks <br />in return is open to suggest alternatives. Mr.. Barker reviewed the discussion regarding donated <br />funds from Mr. Halleen and questioned if in fact Mr. Halleen would donate funds. Mr. Halleen <br />indicated that he is willing to donate the building as well as the fee. It was discussed that at this <br />point final plans are not set so the owner could not guarantee allowing a plaque being placed at <br />the site. It would have to be addressed later if it is feasible or could be worked into the final <br />plans. <br />J. Lang motion that the Landmarks Commission apply to the Ohio Historical Society to <br />recognize this location at the north west corner of Lorain and Porter as a historic site and <br />authorize the placement of a historic marker. P. Baker seconded the motion. Discussion: <br />Councilman Nasher questioned the type of plaque. Mr. Lang reviewed that it would be the <br />brown and gold roughly 3' x 4' as found at other sites throughout North Olmsted. Roll call on <br />the motion: all in favor, "yes" unanimously approved. <br />2