09/09/2004 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

8. Kim Rock• 5938 McKenzie Road: WRD 3 Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a detached garage. The following variance is requested: 1. A 2 foot variance for a detached garage higher than code permits, (code permits 15 ft and applicant shows 17 ft). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (C1)). Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. Mr. Witt, the owner's fiance came fonvard to be sworn in and review the request. Mr. Witt reviewed that they had a garage fire which requires that they rebuild the garage. They will be using the existing footers once what is left of the old garage is demolished. The old garage had a leanto patio which did not look good so they would like to have pillars and to accommodate snow pitch it works out to 17-foot. The board felt that the lieight of the roof was too high. The applicant indicated that with a 15-foot pitch the snow would accumulate on the roof and not run off. The home is quite small and the attic was converted into a bedroom therefore there is no storage area in the home. The board indicated that downspouts must be connected to the drain. Mr. Rymarczyk stated that the building department is requesting that there is no living quarters, above the garage. J. Maloney moved to grant Kim Rock of 5938 McKenzie Road her request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a detached garage and that the following variance is granted as amended. A 2 foot variance for a detached garage higher than code permits, (code permits 15 ft and applicant shows 17 ft). The garage will be required to have downspouts tied into sewer and there is to be no living quarters on the second floor of the garage. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 (Cl)). W. Kremzar seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. 9. Tim & Carrie Montie; 23123 Stonevbrook IDrive: WRD 2 Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of a new shed. The following vai-iance is requested: 1. A 4 foot variance for a storage shed too close to the rear property line. (code requires 10' applicant shows 6'). Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 D4). Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to review the request. Ms. Montie, the owner, and Ms. DeBrodt, a neighbor each came forward to be sworn in and review the request. The applicant reviewed that there once was a shed in the rear yard which included a cement slab and they would like to reuse the existing slab to place a new shed. The applicant showed pictures of existing slab to board members. The board asked if the height of the shed would be impeded by the CEI lines. The applicant does not feel that the CEI lines would interfere with the shed. T'he neighbor indicated that she Nvas present to support the applicant. The board suggested the applicant have CEI visit their home to check the height of their lines as they look low. Mr. Rymarczyk advised the applicant that a standard shed is 10 feet high and the plans show 6-feet. The applicant stated that it is a kit and will be a standard size. Mr. Rytnarczyk suggested that as long as the height is not over 12-feet the height Nvould be within code. N. Sergi moved to grant Tim & Carrie Montie of 23123 Stoneybrook Drive their request for variance (1123.12), which consists of a new shed and that the following variance is granted: A 4 foot variance for a storage shed too close to the rear property line. (code requires 10', applicaa?t shows 61). This is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 D4). T. Kelley seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. 10. Republic Bank; 26777 Lorain Road: WRD 4 Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of changing an existing pole sign. The following varia,nces are requested: 6 ? ?