08/05/2004 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

2e A 12.5 foot variance for a ground sign too close to a side property line, (code requires 20', applicant shows 7.5'), section (1163.26 B). 3. A variance for a traffic hazard (sign located within 35' triangle), (code does not permit 01, applicant shows 1'), section (1163.17 A). 4. A 152 foot variance for. ground signs too close together, (code requires 200', applicant shows 481) section (1163.26 A). Note: #1. This includes an egisting multi tenant sign and an existing pole sign. #2. Changed variance required to 1 directional sign only. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 sections (1163.26 A), (1163.26 B), and (1163.17 A). W. Kremzar seconded the motion. Roll call on the motion W. Kremzar and J. Maloney "yes", N. Sergi with the following comments; she feels that the business can function without the sign and does not see a hardship. After a brief discussion regarding only three board members being present and applicants requiring three affirmative votes to grant or deny the following motions were made. N. Sergi moved to reconsider the vote. W. Kremzar seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. N. Sergi moved to continue the proposal to the next Board of Zoning Appeals meeting dated September 9, 2004. W. Kremzar seconded the motion which was unanimously approved. 2. Robert and Sandra Rock, 3153 Clague Road: WRD 2 Request for variance (1123.12). The proposal consists of erecting a fence. . The following variances are requested: 1. An 18 inch variance for a fence too high in a neighbors front setback on a corner lot, (code permits 30", applicant shows 48"), section (1135.02 F1). 2. A 50 foot variance for a fence higher than 30 inches placed in neighbor's front setback, code permits 0, applicant shows 50'), section (1135.02 F2). Note: Application is for a 4' chain link fence, which is greater than 50% open. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 F1 & F2). Chairman Maloney called all interested parties forward to be sworn in and review the request. Mr. Rock, the owner and Mr. Planovsky a neighbor, each came forward to be sworn in and address the proposal. The applicant would like to have an area for his dogs to run. The fence will be chain link and 4 feet high and the pens will be removed from the frorit yard. W. Planovsky was present to find out what the fence would look like. He was not in favor of a fence as there had never been a fence in the past. The board questioned if the applicant would Ue able to maintain the grass area. The applicant indicated that he would cut the grass by hand if he had too but his pets needed an area in the yard. W. Kremzar moved to grant Robert and Sandra Rock, 3153 Clague Road their request for variance (1123.12), which consists of erecting a fence and that the following variances a.re granted: 1. An 18 inch variance for a fence too high in a neighbors front setback on a corner lot, (code permits 30", applicant shows 48"), section (1135.02 Fl). 2. A 50 foot v:iriance for a fence higher than 30 inches placed in neighbor's front setback, code permits 0, applicant shows 50'), section (1135.02 F2). Note: Application is for a 4' chain link fence, which is greater than 50% open. Which is in violation of Ord. 90-125 section (1135.02 Fl & F2). N. Sergi seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. 2