My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/2/2005 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2005
>
2005 Recreation Commission
>
5/2/2005 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2019 3:09:07 PM
Creation date
1/23/2019 7:54:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2005
Board Name
Recreation Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
5/2/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of a Meeting of <br />The Parks and Recreation Commission <br />May 2, 2005 <br /> <br />introduction of monies to be set aside for an initial tennis study to look at the various properties <br />and sites and see what might work. If soil samples were included in that as part of the study, e.g., <br />there might be a history of wetlands, that might be a necessary step. It was not limited to soil <br />samples. It was more a survey on city properties or any alternate sites that might come into play. <br /> <br />APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br /> <br />Minutes of April 2005 <br /> <br />Mr. Kelley asked if the Members of the Commission read the Minutes from April 2005 and asked <br />for a Motion to approve them. Mr. Jesse moved in favor; the Motion seconded by Mr. Miller. <br />The Chairman asked all members in favor of the Minutes to signify by an aye. There being no <br />objection, the April 2005 Minutes were approved unanimously. <br /> <br />SUB COMMITTEE REPORTS <br /> <br />Collaboration between the Rec Center and School Board <br /> <br />The Sub Committee did not meet since the last meeting of the Rec Commission. Mr. Kelley <br />asked the members of the Sub Committee if there was any pertinent information for the <br />Commission so that there could be another Sub Committee meeting before the next Commission <br />meeting. Mr. DiSalvo asked Ms. Wenger if she was ready to report on this matter. Ms. Wenger <br />replied that the information is one topic to be included in the Report of the Recreation <br />Commissioner. <br /> <br />REPORT OF THE RECREATION COMMISSIONER <br /> <br />Initial Recreation Department Feasibility Study and Survey Cost Information <br /> <br />Upon Mr. Lasko’s arrival at the meeting, Mr. DiSalvo asked Ms. Wenger to submit her report. <br /> <br />Ms. Wenger said that, by way of background, there are two ways that show that this is the right <br />time to proceed with a plan for the Rec Center. The first is the master plan, recently approved by <br />the Planning Commission, and will be going forward on the first reading at Wednesday’s Council <br />meeting. That master plan sets forth the plan for the entire City, in particular focusing on land <br />use. There is also an open space and recreation component that generally discussed the facilities <br />in the City. One of the recommendations of the master plan (and Mr. Lasko sat in on some of <br />these discussions) has been the need to create a more detailed park and recreation master plan. <br />Take the planning and purchase used in the master plan project, focus more intently on the park <br />and recreation community, and create a long-range plan for their maintenance and improvement. <br />About the same time the city and the schools began their discussions, the schools began their <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.