My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/3/2005 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2005
>
2005 Recreation Commission
>
10/3/2005 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2019 3:09:07 PM
Creation date
1/23/2019 7:54:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2005
Board Name
Recreation Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
10/3/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of a Meeting of the North Olmsted Parks & Recreation Commission <br />October 3, 2005 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />looking over the identification (e.g., sugar maple, walnut, black oak, etc.). Hypothetically, if the <br />scout’s idea would be to put pressure-treated two by twos and put little signs on them, that would <br />probably last about two weeks. Something more substantial would then have to be looked at, <br />such as in the National Park Codes or what they use for marking so that vandals and the like do <br />not create a problem. Ms. Powell said she knows it’s been a project that has been talked about <br />for many years and never started or completed. It’s one of those things that may be a lower <br />priority but in terms of making improvements at our community park, that it really needs to be <br />done and can be completed in a short period of time and give some visible results to our residents. <br />Ms. Powell went up to the Park a few evenings in a row, and most of the people felt it a baseball <br />park, not a community park, and they felt that there was very little playground equipment for <br />children. In terms of families, there isn’t enough space for families to come there and have a <br />picnic dinner, for example. There are two shelters, one in disrepair, however, with the pool roof, <br />shelter repair was postponed. Mr. Limpert is trying to get the Rotary involved. <br /> <br />Restrooms/Playground Equipment/Clague Park <br /> <br />Ms. Powell went in the women’s restroom. People were using it, but those restrooms are in <br />deplorable condition. She did not know why they haven’t been properly maintained. Mr. Limpert <br />said they were just painted in August. Ms. Powell said it might have been later in August than <br />when she was there. Here again, when you go to most parks, they are clean and attractive and <br />well maintained. She wondered what the cleaning staff did. Mr. Limpert said that that was the <br />reason why he was interested in the cell tower – the money it generated could be used to provide <br />st <br />several hundreds of thousands of dollars that could be used for building and constructing new 21 <br />Century restrooms in the park. The men’s room dividers were replaced and the walls painted with <br />a fresh coat of white paint. Mr. DiSalvo said that the ladies’ room was painted too. He noted <br />that there are high incidents of vandalism. There are no doors on the men’s stalls. They were <br />replaced with the hockey rink plastic because it’s almost indestructible. To answer your question <br />on the playground equipment, that’s one of the things that was appropriated and/or earmarked <br />for, and it never went to the equipment. <br /> <br />Mr. Limpert said that the Rec Study has been postponed until after the first of the year to come <br />up with $22,000 for the pool roof. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller asked what happened to the money for the playground equipment. Mr. DiSalvo said it <br />was spent towards the pool roof. ($10,000). Mr. Miller said that if he or Mr. Barker goes back <br />to Council to say that the Rec Department needs money for playground equipment, they will <br />wonder what happened to the money already appropriated for it. Mr. DiSalvo said he would be <br />happy to provide Mr. Miller with a list of cap improvements for history. <br /> <br />Mr. Barker asked about the CDBG application. Will this be for playground equipment? Mr. <br />DiSalvo said that he spoke with Kim Wenger today. That is addressing the restroom issues. The <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.