My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/3/2005 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2005
>
2005 Recreation Commission
>
10/3/2005 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2019 3:09:07 PM
Creation date
1/23/2019 7:54:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2005
Board Name
Recreation Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
10/3/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of a Meeting of the North Olmsted Parks & Recreation Commission <br />October 3, 2005 <br /> <br /> <br />year; Mr. DiSalvo replied, “Yes.” Mr. Baxter said that’s not comparing apples to apples but a <br />year to eight months. Mr. DiSalvo responded that this was correct. In the past, a monthly budget <br />could not be set because of the time the program registrations occur. It’s hard to run a budget <br />month to month because it varies too much. Ms. Drenski said that the Rec Department bills in <br />October for the September usage. It used to be projected for the year and divided by twelve; it <br />never worked because one month can be much different than another. Mr. DiSalvo said that it <br />doesn’t develop a pattern because registration dates change annually. Whether it’s an early spring <br />registration or a late winter one, it’s hard to compare year to year mainly because of registration <br />dates and either additional or programs taken away. Mr. Kelley asked Mr. Baxter if he was <br />looking at numbers compared to last year (not revenue); just numbers of different people in <br />different programs? Mr. Baxter replied that was important too, but the dollars are just as <br />important or more important. He understands the difficulty, but asked Mr. DiSalvo if he knew <br />where he was at. Mr. DiSalvo said that he knew where he was internally. He did not want to <br />mislead anyone on numbers. The only issue is that it’s not official until it’s closed out up at City <br />Hall. Linda (Andrews), Secretary, constantly runs whatever is encumbered as far as the expenses <br />go; Barb (Bittner), Bookkeeper, has the income with issues on the spreadsheet on accuracy. The <br />Rec Department has a relatively good idea on what is going on monthly. Duane (Limpert) will <br />affirm that the Rec Center constantly does line transfers to keep it under control. As far as <br />forecasting, the Rec is right on, so when the actual numbers hit, they are right on target. When <br />the actual numbers hit, the Rec is not reeling to get the numbers in place. The system’s working, <br />and Mr. DiSalvo said that once the year is over and the basic accounting software program is <br />running at City Hall more efficiently, it will provide some better numbers. Mr. Baxter said that his <br />only problem was that, as a group, the Commission could not tell by the report if it’s good, poor <br />or outstanding. Mr. DiSalvo said that this might be true, but that there is about $400,000 left <br />targeted for services. Looking at this report, one might think that impossible, but the rink <br />program is just starting. Realistically, those numbers are not far off. The final numbers are two <br />months old; the Rec Department is good at forecasting, but it’s not up to date. Mr. Limpert said <br />that the property taxes, on the revenue side, tend to come as a lump sum, so running through <br />August is two thirds of the year and, backing those numbers up, the Rec Department is close to <br />forecast and the expenditures at $700,000 for a third of the year, the Rec is right about on target. <br />Mr. DiSalvo said he knew the report sounded vague, but it was the best he could do for now. <br />Mr. Baxter had one more question. He appreciated what Mr. DiSalvo had to say, but he noticed <br />capital is way under spent and one would have thought that since August is the summer time, <br />more of that money would have been spent. Mr. DiSalvo said that, typically, what happens with <br />the capital outlay and knowing the pool problems the Rec Department has, he knows that money <br />is earmarked toward capital improvements, but he would rather come up with the money <br />somewhere. That is why the Commissioner purposely backed off when the pool troubles first <br />started in May; he did not go forward with providing new bleachers at North Olmsted Park or the <br />doors at the Rec because he knew there would be repair money needed for the pool. Since the <br />Commissioner has been at the Rec Complex, half of the cap outlay goes toward emergency <br />repairs. It would have had to come from somewhere, so the Rec just transferred more money for <br />the indoor pool out of cap. He understood what Mr. Baxter was talking about. Mr. Baxter said <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.