My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/3/2005 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2005
>
2005 Recreation Commission
>
10/3/2005 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2019 3:09:07 PM
Creation date
1/23/2019 7:54:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2005
Board Name
Recreation Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
10/3/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of a Meeting of the North Olmsted Parks & Recreation Commission <br />October 3, 2005 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />that he remembered what the capital projects were and they were prioritized. Duane (Limpert) <br />and Mr. DiSalvo went to the Finance Department at least two times trying to get some other <br />source in case the money would not be here. Fortunately, the Rec has the funds to cover existing <br />emergency repairs, but if anything happens from this day forward, the Rec Center must start <br />looking again. The capital outlay is gone. The balance is zero. <br /> <br />Ms. Powell wanted to clarify in the minutes of the last meeting the .7 mil continuous operating <br />levy and where that was reflected, and how much is that per year. Is all that money going to pay <br />for a hockey roof? That’s what the minutes said; so when is the Rec going to be finished paying <br />for the hockey roof and have access to that money for other things? When the people came in <br />and griped about the baseball fields more than one person said that they were tax-paying residents <br />for the Rec Center and why isn’t anything being done with the money already being paid. Mr. <br />DiSalvo said that, from his understanding from the past, property and other taxes mainly go for <br />the operational excess of the Rec Center; it’s not included in capital improvement or major <br />emergency repair. On an average, from every $150,000 home, the people are taxed $30 a year <br />going to the Rec Center. Mr. DiSalvo asked to be corrected if he was wrong. Mr. Limpert said it <br />would be more like $70. Mr. DiSalvo said that, for an entire year, it’s appreciated, but the Rec <br />Center is not receiving that much money in taxes. Ms. Powell said that should be publicized, <br />because she felt that the community feels that they are giving a lot more bucks and they are not <br />getting anything out of it. Are the minutes of the meeting incorrect then where that money is <br />going? Mr. Barker said that, when you’re campaigning door-to-door, you hear from the residents <br />that they are paying all the property tax, and they’re not seeing anything for it. On the property <br />tax, the last number Mr. Barker heard was that about $.20 on every dollar goes to the City; the <br />rest goes to everything else – the schools, county, state, whatever. They don’t know where those <br />tax dollars go. It’s good of you to ask these questions, but the general population has no clue <br />where their tax dollars go. Ms. Powell said they should be informed because they are under a <br />gross misconception of how much they are paying and how much they are not getting; if that’s the <br />case… Mr. Limpert said that he’s not one hundred percent sure, but he thinks that it is not all <br />going for the hockey roof; the hockey roof was just under $500,000; the parking lot <br />improvements which were probably done ten to twelve years ago; the Rec is just finishing up the <br />last four years for the pool roof – it was probably 20-year money; so a lot of the .7 mil has been <br />used for leveraging projects that needed to be accomplished, e.g., the pool roof, the parking lot, <br />the hockey roof, and the Safety Director was sure there were other things that went into it. He <br />remembered that when, with Mayor Boyle, the taxpayers voted to make it a continuing .7 mil, if <br />there are major repairs that needed to be repaired, it’s hard to pay for those big projects with <br />borrowed money if there is three years of a levy left and you’d like to have ten or twenty year <br />money. Some money should be coming leveraged as the past repairs are being finished. Ms. <br />Powell said that the minutes of the meeting mentions the hockey roof specifically, but she thought <br />if the money could be creatively used to leverage and tack into other funds and there is another <br />major repair project again, she felt that things were not being communicated to the community <br />about what a good job is being done on a large scale with that small amount of money coming in. <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.