Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of a Meeting of the North Olmsted Parks & Recreation Commission <br />October 3, 2005 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Pool Revenue <br /> <br />Mr. DiSalvo asked if there were any other questions on the revenue and expenditure sheet. There <br />being none, the Commissioner said that the other part of the financial aspect he wanted to show <br />was pool revenue. The report is a nine-month report beginning in January of ’05 up and through <br />September of ’05. On each page what is circled indicates what is being averaged on a daily basis <br />in the aquatic department. A copy of this report is attached. Note that for the month of January, <br />the average was $45.20. For an aquatics department, that alone does not come close to offsetting <br />payroll expenses. This is when the Rec Center is open to the public for open swim sessions. On <br />the last page, the nine-month average on a daily basis comes to $65.87. What is interesting is that <br />for August – with two straight weeks of 90+ temperatures – both pools were fully operational; we <br />averaged $83.00 a day, but the breakdown comes to a daily average of four adults, nine students, <br />three seniors, and a number could not be reached for kids five and under. The Commissioner <br />could not believe that, for as hot as it was, less than thirteen people are being attracted to both the <br />indoor and outdoor pools. These figures do not include monthly passes, so there might be <br />another three people added. Mr. DiSalvo said that, as he has said before, money would be saved <br />if the pools were not open during open swims. This is going to be an issue; we’re losing over <br />$90,000 a year. The payroll to income is not offset properly. The Rec’s lessons and classes do <br />well, but the open times are contributing to excessive expenses. Mr. DiSalvo said he did not have <br />any numbers to compare to other Rec aquatic facilities, but he’s sure they’re bringing in more <br />than an average of $65 a day with there open swim aquatics programs. Mr. Kelley asked the <br />Commissioner what numbers he would be looking at to break even. Mr. Kelley said that, when <br />the pools were closed this past summer, people did not bother to come up to the Rec Center, his <br />family included. The community pools were used. Mr. Kelley said that the Commission does not <br />have the numbers from last year for comparison purposes. However, he ventured to say that this <br />has been going on for a while. Mr. DiSalvo agreed. Mr. Kelley said that, again, the Rec Center is <br />a community center and the reason the Rec has the programs is to offer them to the residents <br />whether it makes money or not. Mr. DiSalvo said that income to payroll in aquatics is running <br />ninety six percent; that’s where the losses are mounting with including the other expenses. Mr. <br />Limpert asked if, for example, the Rec were open 22 hours a day, the Rec would be grossing $2 <br />an hour; on the other hand, if the Rec were open for open swim one hour a day, it would be <br />grossing $45 an hour. Any way you look at it, the numbers are sad, and the magnitude of the <br />misery depends on how many hours we’re talking and also the staffing of the pools. Lifeguards <br />have been on duty that could cover 100 people in the pool and there have been two people in the <br />pool. The Safety Director asked for a better definition by the next Commission meeting; for <br />example, that the Rec is open for open swim for four hours a day, that’s $10 an hour or $20 for <br />two hours. Mr. DiSalvo said that he could get some figures for the next meeting to better define <br />the size of the problem. <br /> <br />Mr. Limpert asked how much cost would it be for a pavilion for the outdoor pool for people to <br />get out of the sun because right now there are two choices: soak or bake. That might have an <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />