10/2/2006 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of a Meeting of The North Olmsted Parks and Recreation Commission October 2, 2006 Page Seven Mr. Dailey said that, in the Master Plan, there is only one scenario that has no ice included, and that was the one where the entire Rec Center was going to be renovated and the ice area was to be turned over into an entire fitness area. The other plans had new or rebuilt rink components. The Westlake plan does make things more interesting, there is no doubt about that. He spoke with the individual last week who is building the facility. There will be two sheets of ice, brand new, opened in September of 2007. Mr. Garrity said it’s a done deal, and at no cost to Westlake; all the proposition needs is a go- ahead from Westlake. Mr. Dailey now has an inkling of what percentage of people will leave because of the new Westlake facility. There are many things to be considered, and North Olmsted must figure out the best way to go with all of this. He did not know if the North Olmsted area could support two brand new sheets in Westlake and something brand new or refurbished here in North Olmsted. It was mentioned that perhaps Rocky River or Winterhurst was going to consider closing, based upon what was going to happen in Westlake. Mr. Garrity’s only concern was this: he knew this was happening months ago. If he knew what was happening, didn’t North Olmsted – and why didn’t the people in North Olmsted go to Westlake and say that it already has a rink; we have room behind our rink; we can offer you this…was that ever thought about? There was a rink here, at least to get going and, from what Mr. Garrity understood, there is acreage in the back. Mr. Dailey said that when he talked to the individual last week, he intimated that no matter what there would be a Rink put in Westlake no matter what because there is a corridor coming right in off I-90 and they were able to do it cheaper there than elsewhere. They knew they could get it done cheaper without the government being involved. Mr. Garrity said that they don’t have to get the government involved; all they have to do is get the government to lease the land, and it’s a done deal. It can be leased for $1. There seems to be uneasiness in the Rink right now. He is willing to bet that 50% of the membership is Westlake, Avon, and Avon Lake. Mr. Dailey said that officially, he could only say that the first he heard of the (Westlake) Rink was when the article was in the paper a few weeks ago. There are always rumors about someone’s going to do something – and many times it’s kept under wraps because they don’t want North Olmsted stealing the brand new rink. He explained that North Olmsted has a history of skating, that the North Olmsted Rec Department was the first with a Rink and a rich Hockey Program. The kids all around the area come to North Olmsted, but it had been decided to go to Westlake. Mr. DiSalvo said, to answer Mr. Garrity’s on support of the Rink, he knows for a fact that everyone in the City is behind keeping the Rink. The only reason they showed the scenarios without the rink was just to get a baseline. Mr. Garrity said that this is true, but the Rink is old, and the questions are old, and it makes a lot of people nervous. Mr. DiSalvo said he understood; it makes him nervous, too. Mr. Dailey said that it’s very possible that one of the plans will go forward, but that, realistically, he did not know if North Olmsted will have another $7,000,000 to build a new Rink, which was projected by the architects. Now North Olmsted must consider what is going on in Westlake. Again, we must consider what we’ll lose and how we will be able to make it up. Is it still worth it to put that Minutes of a Meeting of Page 7