Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of a Meeting of the <br />North Olmsted Parks and Recreation Commission <br />September 11, 2006 <br />Page Two <br /> <br /> <br />SUB COMMITTEE REPORTS <br /> <br />Recreation Master Plan Advisory Board <br /> <br />Mr. DiSalvo noted that everyone on the Recreation Commission attended the meeting of August 17, <br />2006. The basic overview is that over 120 people attended the presentation and open public meeting <br />for the Recreation Master Plan. One hundred and four people responded to the survey that was given. <br /> <br />th <br />All the information from the August 17 meeting is available on the city website under “Planning.” In <br />www.north-olmsted.com <br />entirety, there were seven scenarios presented. The website is under under <br />“Planning”, it’s in a PDF file, where all the plans can be seen. There are scenarios from minor <br />renovations up to brand new facilities. The survey was only given to the people that attended that <br />meeting. It’s impractical to give that survey if you didn’t attend that meeting, but the survey is not a <br />statistically valid representation of information from the entire community. The organizations were <br />well represented, however, the overall resident population of North Olmsted was not. It was more <br />represented by the groups that actually use the facility than the residents. That is why the survey is not <br />a good indicator of what the entire city’s view may be on this matter. That’s why it’s good <br />information, but not enough to go on to make any real decisions yet. With that in mind, it was very <br />valuable in making people aware of the fact that the Rec Master Plan is in the planning stages. Mr. <br />DiSalvo said that the meeting was well received, with a lot of interest and comments. On the website, <br />too, there is a section where comments can be made. This is being reviewed by the Mayor and <br />Planning Director as well. <br /> <br />Mr. DiSalvo repeated that the scenarios went from minor renovations up to new facilities. There were <br />two plans that did not include the rink. That doesn’t mean that the Rec will be eliminating the rink; <br />the thought is to get an idea of what people think. Fitness seemed to stand out the most because it <br />offers the most usage to residents. <br /> <br />Mr. Baxter commented that it is so hard to evaluate whether or not the survey is valid. It’s nice that <br />some of us support the Plan, but what about all the people who have to support the payment of <br />renovations or new recreation facilities. Mr. DiSalvo said that is what will matter. The people that <br />support the Recreation Center were there, but the Rec needs more representation from the entire <br />community. This is recognized, and is why the survey is taken into consideration, but the overall <br />decision will not be based on this survey. <br /> <br />Mr. DiSalvo asked if there were any questions. Mr. Sanborn said that there were approximately 120 <br />people at the meeting and noted that that is less than one percent of the population in North Olmsted. <br />If you said this was not really representative; is the Rec Department planning on going neighborhood <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />