My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/2/2008 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2008
>
2008 Recreation Commission
>
6/2/2008 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2019 3:09:06 PM
Creation date
1/23/2019 8:38:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2008
Board Name
Recreation Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
6/2/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of a Meeting of the <br />North Olmsted Parks and Recreation Commission <br />June 2, 2008 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />will get the legislation but they won’t necessarily get the financial breakdown of what is generated by <br />the tax increase itself. If we can get it through Council earlier, and they always try to with something <br />of this magnitude, asking people for a tax increase, needs to get to Council so they can get a good <br />look at it before they make a decision because Council wants the most information they can get before <br />they put it before the voters. Mr. Groden said that the subsequent Committee meeting would be June <br />th <br />10? Mr. Dailey said that would be the earliest, wouldn’t you, Mr. Mahoney? Mr. Mahoney said that <br />rd <br />he would estimate that if the first meeting was June 3, the Committee meeting would be the week to <br />th <br />follow; there would be a second reading of Council on June 17, and this body could consider it in a <br />meeting in July, so this Commission would have the benefit of two readings of Council and at least one <br />Committee meeting. The answer is yes, but it depends on which Committee it goes to, and what dates <br />are set. <br /> <br />Mr. Dailey said that he understood what Mr. Scarl was questioning is reasonable. Mr. Scarl asked if <br />there would be more meetings with the public: would they be advertised as before? Mr. Mahoney <br />said he didn’t know if they would have to do that. Again, it depends upon what Committee it goes to. <br /> <br />Mr. Dailey said that there is a meeting tomorrow with the schools at City Hall at 11:00 a.m. to discuss <br />this matter. <br /> <br />Mr. Baxter saw in the paper about doing away with the Y, but there was also a letter to the editor by <br />Councilman Ryan which basically said that it would do away with the credit that it allows for people <br />who work outside the City but reside in the City. For many people, this would be costly. Mr. Baxter <br />had not heard this before, but Mr. Ryan is a Councilman, putting it out as if it were being worked. <br />Mr. Dailey said that he did not want to get into Mr. Ryan’s head, but he believed he took a Doomsday <br />scenario that if Council decides to change the income tax credit, which only they can, the numbers <br />were fairly accurate but could have been misinterpreted by the way they were presented. Mr. Scarl <br />said that, in talking with Mr. Ryan and some of the other Council Members, that was discussed at <br />prior Council meetings. Mr. Dailey said that perhaps four or five years ago that it was discussed but it <br />went away. It may have actually been Council Member Ryan who requested what the information <br />was, but that was the only time it came up. It has never been proposed by any administration or <br />finance committee to do that, but evidently Mr. Ryan latched on to that. Mr. Baxter said that it could <br />be something less than whole, but his article implied no credit at all. <br /> <br />Mr. Scarl said that the City is going to be in a deficit. They have taken away as much as they can take <br />away in the Unions of this town and all the other administration people have taken hospitalization cuts <br />and all that, and if the City still runs at a deficit like they say they are going to, and Carrie is pretty <br />scared about having a deficit, it’s got to come from somewhere – taxes. Mr. Dailey said that the City <br />had the meeting as an administrative body to tweak any kind of increased revenue, meeting two or <br />three times in the last month or month and a half, and the City is hoping to minimize the deficit for <br />next year, if that’s what you mean. <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.