Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of a Meeting of the <br />North Olmsted Parks and Recreation Commission <br />April 6, 2009 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Department comes up and hooks their hose right up to the water line in the ground by Diamond #4. <br />Mr. DiSalvo thought it was hooked up to the fire hydrant. <br /> <br />The Commissioner stated that there will be many improvements made this year, but this should have <br />happened ten years ago. For the life of him, he could not understand why these things weren’t <br />completed. <br /> <br />Mr. Lasko and Ms. Nader said there might be some legal issues with Culls. Mr. DiSalvo said he <br />contacted the Law Department and said he has proof that they did not maintain their preventative <br />maintenance program and the things they were not fixing. No one can seem to locate the contract’s <br />exhibits that outline exactly what they are supposed to do. Before this happened, the Commissioner <br />asked Culls for copies; of course, they did not give them to him. Now, the Rec Department can do <br />nothing until we see what exhibits specify what they were supposed to be doing. They were supposed <br />to be doing preventative maintenance, but what does that actually mean. Trying to find a file from <br />1979 is almost impossible. Ms. Nader asked if it would be at City Hall. Mr. DiSalvo said that the <br />problem is that the Directors have changed so many times – it will be in archives somewhere – but no <br />one knows where it is. There had to be at least eight directors over Rec from 1979 to now. The <br />Agreements usually stayed in their office, and through transfers, changing, and archives, who knows? <br /> <br />Mr. Groden asked if Ted (DiSalvo) feels that’s a dead issue as far as pursuing Culls for non- <br />performance of their contract. The Commissioner replied that it’s going to be hard to pursue if we <br />cannot locate a copy of what they were supposed to be doing. All he has is the part that the Mayor <br />signed off and someone from Rec signed off and Culls signed off on how much money we were going <br />to pay for their duties on a monthly basis, but without the specifics on what they were supposed to <br />perform…he talked to Jim Dubelko in the Law Department, telling him that there is nothing on file. <br />Ms. Nader asked if they came in to do maintenance, do Culls write up a ticket…Mr. DiSalvo said that, <br />of course, there were no records of that, but they may have given it to the old Maintenance <br />Supervisor, but we did not find anything in his old files. Minimally, they had to at least change filters, <br />and the Commissioner knew for a fact that they weren’t being changed because the filters are jet black <br />and probably hadn’t been touched in three or four months. Those should be changed on a monthly <br />basis just because of the size of them and to keep efficiency. Then we would like to get them on the <br />filters if we would purchase them and ask them to install them, but we haven’t purchased them in a <br />long time. We have a lot in stock, but we should be ordering filters on an annual basis, and we haven’t <br />ordered them in about five years. <br /> <br />Mr. Groden asked if it would be a substantial amount that could be recovered. Mr. DiSalvo said that, <br />since he has been with the Rec Department, there has been an average of $60,000 to $70,000 paid to <br />Culls a year. The Commissioner has been here seven years; it has to be hundreds of thousands of <br />dollars lost to Culls. That’s his opinion; not fact. Mr. Groden and Ms. Nader said it would be worth a <br />couple hours searching through the archives to find the exhibits. Mr. Scarl asked if the records were <br />microfilmed at City Hall. He knew the Building Department does almost everything and he thought <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />