My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/1/2009 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2009
>
2009 Recreation Commission
>
6/1/2009 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2019 3:09:06 PM
Creation date
1/23/2019 8:51:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2009
Board Name
Recreation Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
6/1/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of a Meeting of the <br />North Olmsted Parks and Recreation Commission <br />June 1, 2009 <br /> <br />conversation. Mr. DiSalvo said, “yes.” Mr. Baxter said that one of the issues that he would suggest <br />to the Commissioner was that certainly the kids that who will enjoy the fields will enjoy it, and they’re <br />a united group just like the night that a number of people came. Those people who feel, like John <br />(Lasko) and I do, that perhaps we should have open space and think that this is a good thing for the <br />community or perhaps a few of the people involved with the soccer or more with the scouts may feel <br />the same way but are not a united group. They’re not going to have the same voice or take the same <br />time to talk to you as much as the people who are in favor of fencing in the park. So, if you’re going <br />to make a decision, and you said you already made it this year, but for next year, you’re not going to <br />get a balanced view of what to do; you’re going to hear the kids who had it this years say it’s the <br />greatest thing and there won’t be anyone else say we’d like to have a good view. It’s not just the <br />residents in the area; I’m speaking more for the residents near the park who use it more than others, <br />but for the residents of the City Mr. Baxter was looking out for, not just those using the park. In fact, <br />he questions are the people using the fence residents, or are they teams of kids, some residents and <br />some not. Certainly he knew of softball leagues that are made up of largely non-residents who tie up <br />the fields. Is that the case for this field as well. Mr. Dailey said that he believed it was North Olmsted <br />kids. Mr. Scarl said that no, this year it’s a different thing, with about eight different communities <br />within the Southwestern Conference. There will be two to three residents on each team, with about <br />eight teams. So, our kids will be mixed in with other ones. So, instead of 17, 18, 20 kids of residents <br />will be split among three to four teams with other people. All the residents will primarily be playing <br />here; this is their home field. Mr. Baxter said he thinks it’s never going to change was this decision is <br />made. Mr. Dailey disagreed. He’s faced down many noisy residents before, whether it’s before City <br />Council or School Board or now as member of the Administration where the people from East Park, <br />North Park, West Park don’t like it, and they won’t be quiet about it. Again, any time we get <br />information from people whether it’s you or some little girl writing a letter, all these things go under <br />advisement. We may find it’s a bad decision, and we may change it next year. We’ll see how it works <br />out. Mr. Mahoney asked what’s the name of the organization that has this league, do we know? Mr. <br />Scarl said it’s just North Olmsted High School Softball Baseball Program. Some of freshmen, <br />sophomores, juniors going on to be seniors. Mr. Mahoney said he assumes there is no fee for the <br />summer program, right? Mr. Scarl said they pay for fields, lining, etc. Mr. Mahoney asked how much <br />they paid. Mr. Scarl said he did not know. Mr. DiSalvo said it’s $15 per permit and $15 per lining. <br />Mr. Dailey noted that the fields are open to the public to use any other time to use when there are no <br />games going on. <br /> <br />Mr. Groden just wanted to make one comment: he learned one term this evening: “detrimental <br />reliance,” and this is not meant to be disparaging upon any one or group of people, but it seems there <br />were two occasions tonight where things were switched quickly without much notice. I would like to <br />think that if we’re going to make further changes to programs that have been in existence for a long <br />time and people have come to expect certain things, that maybe we should be more forward thinking <br />so that we can get notice out to people that this change might be coming, and maybe it’s coming next <br />year. Mr. Dailey said that it’s always great to be able to give that much of a notice, but sometimes in a <br />business, which is what we are, you must react with the information that is in front of you, e.g., with <br />how we’re charging fees. He still thinks we’re giving the swimming program away, but next year <br />we’ll tweak it up a little bit more, then bill a little more gradually every year. As far as the park fence <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.