6/1/2009 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Minutes of a Meeting of the North Olmsted Parks and Recreation Commission June 1, 2009 to any other athletes on any other North Olmsted sports team as well. We were trying to figure out why the high school swim team athletes had the discount, and it was at the discretion of the previous Aquatics Supervisors, with no authorization from me, let alone the Department Director as well. The way our finances are, Mr. DiSalvo hated to say this, but the Rec Department just cannot offer discounts on our programs. More or less, they don’t qualify to receive the discount just because of previous years, which was totally at the Aquatics Directors’ discretions; it did not reach my desk one time. Mr. DiSalvo said that he was blindsided by it. He hopes that makes sense. Mr. DiSalvo thought that Ms. Troyer dealt more with Chris Wetmore than…you had to because I didn’t speak to anybody about this…Ms. Troyer said that she did not deal with anybody. Mr. DiSalvo said that he wished Chris was here, because he has more detailed recollection of what went on between the Rec and the North Olmsted High School Swim Team. Ms. Troyer said that this goes back beyond Cindy Bartko – do you remember Donna Zalle (sp?) – she was the Aquatics Supervisor for 18 years. It was the same fee. In fact, Ms. Troyer just cleaned – she had eight Rec Center books from about ten years ago that had listed Rec Center fees that high school swimmers paid. She pitched the books this past winter and wishes she still had them. Mr. DiSalvo said that he believes her; Ms. Troyer said it was not really a discount, it was a program for the high school swimmers. We were not discounted any rates. It was just that high schoolers don’t use the coaching; they don’t use the pool time…the whole purpose of it was to build the community and build the team. The purpose of it was not a discount. Mr. Dailey said he would be curious as to why the numbers dropped; just because we raised the rate the $95; is it a sign of the economy? We’ve seen other numbers drop across other programs across the City of North Olmsted, both here at the Rec Center and those who golf at Springvale. Right now we don’t know if it’s been the wet spring or the economy at Springvale. We’re trying to figure out why the program numbers aren’t where they used to be. On the flip side of it, though, we are a business. We know that next year we’re facing $90,000 less in revenue based on appraisals, and we’re going to make up that difference in this community as a body as a City. Even though it’s only $50 or $70 or whatever those numbers turn out to be, all those numbers really add up when you start to take them out of all of our programs. Like anything else we do, we’ll review it. We’ll see if it makes sense to adjust it down next year or maybe come somewhere in the middle. Every time there is a decision made, nothing is ever in stone; it’s just that we need to review it as it goes along because we’re a changing community and a changing economy, and we don’t know what we’re going to have to do to generate more numbers. Much as we’ve discussed before here, we’re a competitive pool, a lap pool; we’re not a family fun, come-hang-out Rec Center day pool. We understand that. We have to find out where our niche market is. At the same time, like you, we have to be cognizant of the fact that we’re facing a major shortfall next year. We are already projecting $1.5 to $2 million dollars. Chris Scarl questioned the fact that there were four high schoolers enrolled at $95 for a total of $380. How many enrolled last year? It was noted that there were about two boy relays (eight boys) and probably three to four girl relays (32 girls). So at $20 per person; if you get 40 people, that’s $800 v. right now, we’re just going to get about $380. For $20, Mr. Scarl continued, he thinks the Rec could double its revenue. He did not know how many people are going to sign up, but right now, there’s only four for $380. Page 3