My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4/7/2003 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2003
>
2003 Recreation Commission
>
4/7/2003 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2019 3:09:07 PM
Creation date
1/23/2019 9:44:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2003
Board Name
Recreation Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
4/7/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Recreation Commission Meeting <br />April 7, 2003 <br /> <br /> <br />This concluded the Report of the Recreation Commissioner. <br /> <br />REPORT BY SAFETY DIRECTOR <br /> <br />Mr. Jesse reported that the City has retained a consultant to put together a security plan for the <br />Recreation Center. The concept is to assess what the security risks are and what the problems <br />are, and it would be the Commissioner's responsibility to put together an RFP that has better plans <br />and specifications as far as putting together the actual security hardware, software and training. <br />There are many training issues, particularly as regards security awareness and response. The City <br />also wants to make it a very "soft" security system. One of the main concerns ties into who enters <br />the building but, more importantly, who leaves. The City is trying to tie this together with the <br />computer information system so that if someone registers for a class or league prior to the class <br />the security system would know that they have registered and that their I.D. cards are O.K. Also, <br />there would be Internet registration access. The City is in the process of finalizing a consultant <br />selection for the computer plan as well for the Rec Center's entire computer needs (programming, <br />Internet access, etc.) Hopefully, the City will have an outline ready for the next Rec Commission <br />Meeting. The requirement for the firms would be that they have the RFP rating for bid on June <br />st <br />1, with the hope that we have implementation by the end of the year, and a large part of the <br />computer system in place by August or September. <br /> <br />The major question is: where is the funding coming from? Please consider this between now and <br />the next Commission Meeting. Part of the money will be recouped from management black <br />holes. As far as the concession stands, the lack of fees paid by people who should have paid, as <br />well as in the Pro Shop and fees at the gate. The estimate right now is that there is somewhere in <br />the neighborhood of $50,000 and $100,000 in gate losses. There may be a necessity to put a user <br />fee in position prior to recognizing that cash flow. It would be a situation where everyone would <br />pay a minimum fee to get through the turnstyle, perhaps fifty cents or a dollar, to get the security <br />system in place. Ms. Jones objected to paying to get into the building just to observe. Mr. Jesse <br />said that this is an idea, but the City must find a means to pay for losses because of ordinance <br />requirements. When an expense comes up, the City wants to know where the money is coming <br />from. An incident of a wallet stolen last week from a locker by using bolt cutters, and $4,000 <br />charged by the thief within a few hours, was cited as a reason to implement security as soon as <br />possible. Since these incidents make the papers, the City becomes an easy target, and if there is a <br />security system implemented, the Rec Center is no longer a target of choice. Mr. Limpert <br />suggested extra money being structured in as part of an annual membership fee of $5.00 or <br />$10.00 to avoid a one-time fee if a person would be at the Recreation Complex many times during <br />the course of a year. Mr. Gareau expanded on this notion by putting forth the argument that the <br />money is necessary because it's directly related to a security feature. The point is that there need <br />to be creative ways to come up with extra money to implement the security system short of <br />slashing programs and cutting staff. Ms. Jones propounded an added fifty cents to a program <br />fee. Mr. Gareau noted that the City is going to spend a lot of money to stop a person who has <br />bolt cutters in his coat or bag with an intent to steal. It's easier to put your valuables in <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.