My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/3/2003 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2003
>
2003 Recreation Commission
>
3/3/2003 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2019 3:09:07 PM
Creation date
1/23/2019 9:44:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2003
Board Name
Recreation Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
3/3/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Recreation Commission Meeting <br />March 3, 2003 <br /> <br /> <br />The total amount for these repairs would be a ballpark figure of about $100,000. Preventative <br />maintenance was never done. As for the 2003 budget, because there was no Commissioner and <br />the Department had to submit its budget, one percent was just figured into the 2002 figure. Mr. <br />DiSalvo expressed his desire to increase income, not expenses. Transfers can be made if the <br />revenue will be brought in within a six month mark and then at the end of the year. An example <br />was proposed that, to help fund the cost of the bleachers, there could be a $5 surcharge placed on <br />a ticket to a swim meet, $1 going to the schools. There would be a contract taken out, with the <br />surcharges paying for the contract. Ms. Hayes suggested speaking with the Athletic Director at <br />the High School to see if this would be viable since the Ohio Athletic Association sets rates. <br />Mr. Kelley observed that it is the rink that generates the money, not the pool; yet the biggest <br />amount of money needed is for pool work. Why would rates for the rink be raised for the pool’s <br />work? If rates are to be raised, they should be raised for the pool instead of across the board to <br />include the ice rink. There was discussion among the members that the North Olmsted pool is <br />just a pool, not elaborate like pools in surrounding communities. Mr. Baxter stated that the ice <br />rink bears a lot of the expenses with the heating and ice, so there is a sense of balance between the <br />pool and rink. It sounds, though, that the Recreation Center needs more than it’s asking for <br />repairs. Anna Kanis commended Tom Stein for keeping the Rec Center together on a shoestring. <br />Mr. Limpert said that, although this is commendable, perhaps a project should have been done <br />each year and the list of repairs would not be so long today. Mr. Miller said that Todd Morgan <br />went to Council about four years ago, stating that the Rec Center is on “life support.” The <br />problem has been that the City has always been competitive with its rates, trying to survive, but <br />it’s very difficult to do without more support from the General Fund. He agreed that a new sign <br />is in order at Lorain Road in front of the Complex, wanting more than a small sign. The situation <br />becomes very problematic for Council has other issues, such as the Fire Station needing a new <br />roof, to deal with as well. It’s all challenging and means looking over the numbers and coming in <br />with a good plan. Mr. Limpert interjected that the Rec Center needs to come up with a plan to <br />aggressively grow revenue, be it through new programs, improving new programs such as Learn <br />to Skate, and looking toward more than a 1% or 2% increase in revenue over a year. Mr. <br />Limpert expressed confidence in the new Commissioner’s ability to make things happen. <br /> <br />Mr. DiSalvo continued by saying that Tom Stein agreed with him that if you don’t have a place of <br />recreation you’re not going to have any place. The Commissioner apologized if he was speaking <br />out of turn, but said that purchasing a $50,000 sign made no sense when other matters take <br />priority. If there are good programs, word travels. If the Rec Center does not have things that <br />work and doesn’t entertain preventative maintenance, there will be no Rec here, period. Mr. <br />Stein and Mr. DiSalvo are exactly on the same page, and the Commissioner supports Mr. Stein <br />100%. The Commissioner did not want to paint a bleak picture, but it’s more or less reality at <br />this point. <br /> <br />The next topic of discussion was facilities management software. The brand name looked at in <br />the past was RecWare. Facilities Management Software offers a wider range of software <br />products, and it’s set up more like a business rather than one area as in RecWare. This will be <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.