Laserfiche WebLink
1. <br />NOF:' I -Y CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION <br />!N't- ..RMAL SPECIAL MEETING -- OCTOBER '15, 1986 <br />r, siding: Patricia Bahas, Robert Wendt, Chairman, Mark Musial, Peg Hill, <br />Saki ,��.tary. <br />Also present Flash Fairfield,'Westlife correspondent. <br />Mr. Wendt confirmed with Pais Bahas the date for the Police Agility <br />Test .scheduled for Saturday- November 1, 1986 at the high school. <br />Mr. Musial was concerned abort a phone call he received inquiring <br />if a person would be disqualified from taking the test if they had <br />a felony record. Mrs. Bahas answering the question stated - if the <br />person stated on the application she or he had a felony record as <br />an adult - it would be up to the hiring authority, but they would <br />be granted an interview. However, if such a record existed as a <br />juvenile then we would have no right to ask the quest'.on. <br />sr. Musial presented and read his letter going to Mr.'Levine of the <br />Sate Board of Personnel Review. This letter was an answer to a <br />letter requesting an investigation into the Carol Ward vs City of <br />North Olmsted.case. (Letter and Legal Opinion by Michael Gareau <br />in file.) His feeling was the Commission did not have jurisdiction <br />over this matter, however, did state in the letter that the Com- <br />mission was split in this decision - two voting not to hold a <br />hearing and one voting to have a hearing. <br />Mrs. Bahas quoted from the Civil Service rules with respect to hiring <br />within the city, example; clerk's job, showing that the department <br />heads do the hiring and firings are done on the basis of the employees <br />evaluation. Discussion ensued with regard to appointing authority. <br />Mrs. Bahas read her letter going to the State Board, which will be an <br />addendum to Mr., Mus,_4.al's letter. <br />Mrs. Bahas stated her main concern was a definition of the words "re- <br />assignment" and "transfer". A clarification is needed now to effect <br />any future cases coming before the Commission. This would also determine <br />whether or not we., the Commission, had the right to hear such cases. <br />Both M-�. Wets-z,t and Mr. Mur `a�' -r?^« that a. clear definition should <br />be made. As iry- ,c:• staud� a'U. :re in ar..c:.sdance it we.s ambiguous. <br />Discussion fc o -lowed on the attacbw...;a`L-._ 'Io the above letters to avoid <br />duplications. <br />ad_J. -ned at 8233 p.,m., <br />............................ <br />