Laserfiche WebLink
FA <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION <br />5200 Dover Center Road • North Olmsted, Ohio 44070 <br />Phone: 777-8000 Ext, 232 <br />Fax: 777-5889 <br />CIVIL SERVICE MEETING MINUTES: APRIL 17, 1995 <br />PRESENT: Commissioners Jim Hines, Glenn Marks, Lois Zolar, <br />Secretary Tracy Ice <br />GUESTS: Capt. Ruple, Chief Sefcek, Mr. & Mrs. Smith, Peggy and Jack <br />Rhodes, Jay Power, Ron Wilamosky, Carolyn Kasler, Emanse <br />and Mary Smith <br />MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING APPROVED AS READ <br />OLD BUSINESS <br />Jackie Smith Secretarial II - Attached please find a two page <br />attachment to these minutes. Jackie started out the meeting reading <br />the first two pages of her letter to Jim Hines and the Civil Service <br />Commission, dated April 17, 1995. Please read those two pages at this <br />time and then read the responses below. <br />Jim Hines asked Ron Wilamosky if this is a Civil Service Issue or a <br />Union Issue. <br />Ron said that Jackie was working under the bargaining union agreement <br />and therefore she has no right of appeal under Civil Service but that <br />she does have a procedure through the Union. Civil Service's role is <br />the initial hiring. <br />Ron said that Managment has 180 days to evaluate the employee's skill <br />and for the employee to perform the job tasks. The Commission knows <br />that the job description requires that for the Secretarial II position <br />that the employee must type a minimum of 45 wpm. <br />Ron mentioned that Carolyn Kasler decided to lay --off Jackie where in <br />fact that under the bargaining union agreement that Jackie could have <br />been terminated for non-performance based on the terms of the <br />agreement. <br />Carolyn Kasler said that if and when a position opens up that the top <br />three candidates, from our eligibility list, would be interviewed and <br />tested for skill and ability. <br />Jackie said, if this is the case, why did Civil Service have the right <br />to throw out the typing test in 10193? <br />Jim Hines replied that the issue in 1993 was that we were testing on <br />old selectric typewriters which the city no longer uses. This test <br />then would not be valid. <br />Jackie asked why this wasn't addressed to the union. <br />