Laserfiche WebLink
issues with the proposal due to the unique location of the woods and drive. Ms. Patton thought it <br />would add value and did not think it would have a detrimental impact to the neighbors. Mr. <br />Allain thought the applicant kept the addition consistent with the layout of the home and did not <br />have any concerns about the project. <br />Mr. Papotto moved, seconded by Mr. Rahm, to approve the following variances for 20- <br />16204; Matt & Barb Simoncic; 5770 Canterbury Road: <br />1. A 39.25 ft. variance for rear yard setback; code requires 50 ft.; applicant shows 10.75 <br />ft.; Section 1135.06(D). <br />2. A variance for enlarging a non -conforming dwelling in a manner that does not conform <br />to required setbacks; code permits enlargement of a non -conforming dwelling so long as <br />yard regulations and setback requirements are met; applicant shows the addition <br />encroaching into the rear yard; Section 1165.02(B)(2). <br />Motion passed 5-0. <br />COMMERCIAL APPEALS AND REQUESTS <br />20-16191; Nissan; 28596 Lorain Road <br />Representatives: Dan Barcikoski, MG Civil Design, 255 Park Place, Chagrin Falls, OH; Brian <br />Fabo, Fabo Architecture, 1736 Columbus Road, Columbus, OH; Lou Brossard, Ward 1 <br />Councilman <br />Proposal consists of a parking lot expansion. Property is zoned B-3 General Business. <br />The following variance is requested: <br />1. A 10 ft. variance for buffer zone depth; code requires 30 ft. buffer where B-3 General <br />Business District abuts a One Family Residence District; applicant shows 20 ft. buffer; Table <br />1139.06-3. <br />Ms. Lieber stated that the applicant proposes to expand their parking lot and install a new storm <br />water management system in the rear of the property. Based on the zoning of the property (B-3) <br />and the zoning of the adjacent properties (One Family Residence), a 30 -foot buffer zone is <br />required. The applicant proposes a 20 -foot buffer requesting a variance of 10 feet. Mr. <br />Barcikoski said the applicant is requesting the variance because the demand for sales and new <br />car inventory is high. Currently, Nissan leases land along Lorain Road to store inventory which <br />is becoming inconvenient and inefficient. The parking lot extension would reduce traffic on <br />Lorain Road. The project would also include curbs, fencing, an underground detention system <br />and landscaping. The proposed setback would be in line with the neighboring dealership's <br />setback. The addition would provide 60 parking spots. There is an existing board on board fence <br />along the western property line that will connect to the new fencing. Mr. Fabo said this proposal <br />was approved in 2010 but Nissan decided to purchase the corner lot at that time instead of <br />proceeding with this project at that time. There is an existing storm sewer chamber that needs to <br />be repaired and would be cost prohibitive when compared to installing a new system. No new <br />lighting will be installed as part of the project. The cars parked in the expanded area would only <br />be moved when a customer would like to test drive them. <br />Mr. Brossard was with the resident whose property abuts the rear property line and asked if the <br />existing cluster of pine trees would be affected. Mr. Barcikoski said the trees in the hatched area <br />