My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/7/2021 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2021
>
Building and Zoning Board of Appeals
>
6/7/2021 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2021 12:14:40 PM
Creation date
9/13/2021 12:13:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2021
Board Name
Building & Zoning Board of Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
6/7/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Representative: Dale Schmidt, owner <br />Proposal consists of a new office warehouse. Property is zoned Limited Industry. <br />1. A 5 ft. variance for parking setback along the west property line; code requires side yard <br />setback of 10 ft., applicant shows 5 ft., Table 1143.03-1. <br />2. A 5 ft. variance for parking setback along the south property line; code requires rear yard <br />setback of 10 ft., applicant shows 5 ft., Table 1143.03-1. <br />Ms. Lieber said the applicant proposes to construct a new office warehouse facility in the <br />Limited Industry District. The parking and pavement encroaches into the required setbacks along <br />the west and south property lines. On the west, a setback of 10 feet is required and the proposal <br />shows 5 feet. On the south, a setback of 10 feet is also required and the proposal shows 5 feet. <br />Mr. Schmidt reviewed the site layout and said all building setbacks have been accommodated. <br />He needs to preserve enough room for trucks to turn into the bays. He is also the property owner <br />to the south and may join the properties in the future. Only a small amount of parking <br />encroaches. He would like to keep the curb cut on Industrial Parkway as far from Lorain Road as <br />possible. He has worked to meet all city requirements including those for stormwater detention. <br />Ms. Lieber said Mr. Schmidt has shared the possibility of future expansion to the west and he is <br />the also the owner of the most impacted property to the south. All surrounding land is zoned <br />Limited Industry. She said this will be a good project for the city and that the variance requests <br />are minor and should not create negative impacts. Mr. Mackey said it appears a lot of thought <br />has gone into the planning for the project. Mr. Rahm agreed this is a good project for the city in <br />terms of economic development. Mr. Papotto said he was happy to hear the applicant is working <br />with staff on a site plan that works and appreciates the need for sufficient truck turning area. <br />Mr. Mackey moved, seconded by Mr. Rahm, to approve the following variances for 21- <br />18812; DASHE, LLC; 31441 Lorain Road: <br />1. A 5 ft. variance for parking setback along the west property line; code requires side <br />yard setback of 10 ft., applicant shows 5 ft., Table 1143.03-1. <br />2. A 5 ft. variance for parking setback along the south property line; code requires rear <br />yard setback of 10 ft., applicant shows 5 ft., Table 1143.03-1. <br />Motion passed 3-0. <br />21-19367; Recess; 26636 Brookyark Extension <br />Representatives: Dan Beeman, Wagner Electric Sign Co.; James Grasso, Recess Games <br />Proposal consists of signage. Property is zoned B-4 Mixed-use Business. The previous request <br />for additional signage was denied at the May 3, 2021 BZBA meeting. <br />1. A 55 sq. ft. variance for excessive sign area per building unit; code permits 55 square feet <br />based upon fagade width, applicant shows 155 sq. ft. (100 sq. ft. existing + 55 sq. ft. <br />proposed), Table 1163.12-1. <br />Note: An existing 100 sq. ft. sign was previously approved. The building unit currently exceeds <br />permitted sign area. <br />Ms. Lieber said the applicant is proposing a second sign for a building unit. The entire second <br />sign's square footage requires a variance for excessive sign area per building unit, which is 55 <br />square feet. The BZBA denied a request for 108 square feet of excessive sign face at its May <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.