My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/6/2022 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
2022
>
Building and Zoning Board of Appeals
>
6/6/2022 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2022 11:08:11 AM
Creation date
7/18/2022 10:38:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
2022
Board Name
Building & Zoning Board of Appeals
Document Name
Minutes
Date
6/6/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I A 6 It. variance for a driveway extending for a distance (depth) greater than 20 ft. from <br />the garage doors before tapering back at no Iess than a forts-five (45) degree angle; code <br />permits 20ft., applicant shows 26 (i-. Section 1135.02(B)(2)(c). <br />Ms. Bija, explained that with recent changes with the owner's family they are in need of a larger <br />garage for storage. Also she mentioned a setback stated the setback variance would <br />accommodate the city by allowing them a clearer access. <br />Mr. Gareau, asked for clarification with the city property. Mr. Papotto asked the applicant it <br />there is a drainage easement? Ms. Bija said yes. Mr. 6areau asked if the drainage easement on <br />the parcel is on the rear of the lot'? Ms. Bija stated that the easement runs along the existing <br />driveway. there was a discussion on whether this was a recorded easement or Swale casement. <br />The applicant explained that they will not he constructing in the area of the easement. <br />Ms. Patton stated her concern with the request is the significance of the additional square footage <br />that would be needed. compared to what would be typically allowed and how that might impact <br />the overall aesthetics of the neighborhood. <br />Ms. Bija, asked if she could comment, Mr. Papotto stated no, not at this point since we are in <br />discussion. <br />Mr. Mackey asked it this would be used as commercial use. Ms. Bija, said no, <br />Mr. Papotto, agreed with Ms. Patton on the size of the garage. Ile explained that the proposed <br />garage would be directly behind two other neighboring garages and believes the space going <br />back to the cul-de-sac would not affect any of those homes. Ms. Patton agreed that how the <br />proposed garage is set up would not be un-slightly for the neighborhood however, her concern is <br />the size of the garage. Mr. Papotto, agreed with Ms. Patton on the size_ <br />Mr. Mackey moved, seconded by Ms. Patton, to approve following variance for 22-21762; <br />New Creation Builders; 2845 Walter Rd. <br />I. A 609 sq. ft. variance for area of private garage:. code permits 750 sq.. applicant shows <br />1359 sq. ft.- Section 1 135.02 (B)(I )(a). <br />_. A 6 ft. variance for a driveway extending for a distance (depth) greater than 20 ft. From <br />the garage doors before tapering back at no less than a forty-five (45) degree angle: code <br />permits 20ft.. applicant shows 26 ft., Section 1135.02(B)(2)(c). <br />Motion Denied 0-3. <br />22-21985; Jennifer & Nicholas Dreher; 5603 Burns Rd. <br />Representative: Jennifer Dreher 5603 Burns Rd., owner: Andrew Votaw 5593 Burns Rd. <br />Proposal of a new fence in front yard. Property is zoned B-One Family Residence. <br />The following variance is requested: <br />1. A 7 in. variance for height of a fence in the front yard: code allows a fence in the front <br />yard not to exceed 30 in, applicant shows 3 ft. 1 in., Section 1135(D)(2). <br />Note: lie fence is a 3 ft. I in. high split rail. The portion that extends beyond the house is <br />located in the front yard. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.