10/3/2022 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

BCILDING & ZONINGBOARD OF APPEALS CI"FI OF NORTH OLNISTED NIINF'EES OF O('TOBER 3, 2022 ROLL(ALL ('haimtin Papottu called the meeting to order at 7:110 p.m. in ('uuncil (hentbcr,. Present: Bob Papotto. Dan Rahm. Ralph Macke%. Stoic Patton Stale I.ays Director Michael (Iarenu. .Ir.. Ruildin'-I Conrdinmor Katie Seeley. Cite Planner Nahid Parmpour.: Administraliec Assistant Kristine Jones. - REI'IEN AND CORRECTION OF NI1NF1 I -IS The meeting minutes of Septemher 12, 2022 gill he tabled until the next Building & Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting on Nncember 7, 21122. RESIDEN IIAL APPEALS AND REQlF.S1'S 22-2298,; Superior Fence& RaiVTimotM Ilarxex-4489 Michael Ace Representati e: Doug Willse: 6t)091_ngle Rd.. Suite +� �bliddleburg I It,- Off Propusul of a ICoCe. Propat\ is ioncd ( -One I amih Residence. The hollowing h ariancc ie requested: I_ A ; in. %ariancc to the winimum upaintion bet,tecn lcnecs on a common propart% line_ code requires _4 in_ applicant pan ides 19 ill_ Section 11620+1D7 Mr. %%i1kc explained that Ihe} installed the Icacc per the customer s desires in hots the% w;mted l0utiliie Ihcir card space. I loweser. h%hen the% installed the fence it is onh 19 inches Gom the neiehhol:v existing wood fence on the cast side of the propert%. I le noted thm there i, adequate space in behviceh the Icnces to pro%ide ground nuhinlenancc Lath Director Gareau explained that this is not a t ariancc request undCihe zoning code bill it is a modification to the Building (ode. I le relerenced I I I'AP Of the code enlbrccment 1114x"! is aulJ he nt:mifesl injustice. hhoul l he contrail to the 9plril .mJ purpo,e uft1h, IindJIll'' ( o,lC nr public interest or h, [tell. in its opinion. the interprcuuion of the Ruildinu (anunissioner .honlJ he modillcd w rc%crscd. I haralhrc- Ibis is the standar) 1111 hoard would be Iookine m. Ms. Patton asked it permit tsa, pulled prior to the itutallution of fence Mr. Willse stated that the% did ha%c a permit. and an inspector came nut to inspect the post holes and there wus no indication of Lill h potential h iolations Iherelow then assumed then RCie �\ ithin the cit% e regulati nils. 11x. SCele% indicated that the (iIN doe, not do post hole inspections. onh 0nal_ V1s. Seelec stated that all of the Cin > pernhil, for knees are stamped and sante Ihe% mmt maintain two feet bemeen parallel neighburine knees and the fence cannot encroach on a neighbor'x properts and propertc lines must he nwrked. I hercloie. all of per ahead nt installation .tale the% need to maintdin the oho tet from the neighboring propert%line. She