10/3/2022 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

stated that a permit etas issued h(MCNCr it billed inspection because die ICIICc NNas not MO Icet hempen neiehhorina fences_ Mr. Maekec asked it there are am easement at the [call or side, of the propene that \eould aticd anN placemmlits of the fence Ms- SceleansNwred that all, casements NNmuld hake been identified during the pennit process. Mr. A'111sc c\plained that thec passed the initial inspection of the post hole placements. lis. SeeleN stated that dte do not do [lust hole inspections and tilev onh do a linal inspection in which thee luiled. lit Rohm commented that it is or ditlleult decision xince the leacC is ulreadN installed, ho\\eeer the arca hrtNwon the tcnces seem to be manageable Nis, Patton or iced that is alNNaes tuu_h NN hen the board is luokine at a case Nchen the installation has alreactc been completed. She also noted that this is not ideal hoNve cr there is still adequate ,pace to maintain the grass bemecn the fences. Mr. Rahm moved, seconded he Ms. Patton to approve the following tariance for 22-22985; Superior Fence & Rail/Timothy Mme —4489 Michael Ave: I. ,A S in. variance to the minimum separation between fences on a common propertc line, code requires 24 in., applicant protides 19 in., Section 1369.03(1)) Motion Passed 4-0. 22-22986; Superior Fence & Rail /Tiffam Dawson — 6487 Surrcv Dr. Repr"craa ice: Doug UA illse. 6909 1 nerl Rd. Suite li Middlehure I lewlits and Ren A1111ci 6471 Surrc% Driec. Proposal of a tinct Propene is zoned 1 -One I amilc Residence. The tollmNine eariance is requested: L A 14 in. Narianec to the mininmm separation betNeeen fences un a common propertc line: code requires 24 in.. applicant prnides 0 in.. Section 1309.01(1)) blr. % i11sc explained that on three sides of the pruperh the lence NNus installed Ncith adequotc cleatnncc lumce er the Icnce un (he north side otthe propene line is installed up the nciehhor s chain-link fence He stated that thec installed the knee per els. Daetson s request and thce Necre under the assumption that she had permission from Nli. Miller to do so. Mr. %filler stated that he Meas unmNIUC that the IMCC Neal going to be built and ecpluined thin Ball a zero clearance it is impossible to do ane IN pe of maintenance in-bemeen the fences. Also. Nchen he installed his lincc it NNus installed three inches from the propertc line to cnsurc cleuranee that the fence Ncas installed on his propene_ I le is eeonderine if Ms. IM,v,o i , fence is encmaehing into his prupertc line. Nis. Secle% commented that the Building Department is riot 'm Enol of this request since the Applicant could hake abided he the mento -lour -inch separation. the ('itc does not Net iii oiled NN ith prupertc line disputes.