10/3/2022 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I lm Uirectrr (iareuu COmmented that \1 r. Millcn concern Frith encroachment onto this property is a leaitimac concern and the lot line \sould lace to he resohed be o sunecor.:Also, the Cit' does not resole am property line disputes and it is the respunsibilih of the properts usvnei to ensure that then are installing on their propert_. Mr. Masker stated that it the tense is Installed on lir. Millers propert-N and he decides to sell his home this could result in potential problems. AIr. (lawau, silted that the deterimnation of the lot line should be idenilled and a suncNor should he hired. Mr. Papotto asked Nl,. ,Stele if a FLiry ev needs to be dune hdbre the installation of e Icsec. Ms. ScelcN responded shot not a surccv but the propene lines must he marked. She eeplmlled that it is the propert) oxcnei s responsihilin to krum �chere their prupertc lines arc not the ( Ib 's. Vis. Patton stated that the request could ads ersck attest a neighbor,. Mr. Rahm commented that there arc too pram un -addressed questions mgardille the propert, line. Air_ Mecke, stated he is also not in tawr of request eiccn the legal coutplicatlonx that could arise. Mr. (iareuu stated that the tcnce \wuld need to he rcmoced Lind established to meet code. thev kill also need to idcntilt \s here the propettt line is. Rurthennore. the current knee cannot stat the v,Lin it is hecause the sariunce requcat Coal denied_ .Mr. Rahm moved, seconded by NIs. Patton to approre the follossing carianec for 22-22986: Superior Fence & hail / I iffam Dais son —6487 Surrey Dr. I. A 24 in. variance to the minim on separation hehceen fences on a common propert IN code requires 24 in., applicant prmides 0 in., Section I369.03(D) Motion Denied 0-4. 22-22988• Superior Fence & Rail/ Stephen Ellis — 23326 Sharron Drive. Representutise DouL, N illse: 6909 k.nehe Rd Suite l, \iichdlehure I Its. & Stephen I'Ilis: '_G Sharon Dr. Proposal of it Dense. PropcM is Toned ('-One Pamir Residence, the folhmine sammce is requested: I. ,A 9 in. Nariuncc to the minimum separation heuNeat tenses on a common propert, line: code ICLIMIes 14 in_ applicant proy ides 1 i in.. Section 1169.030D) _. ;A 6 in. carianec to the mininwm separation helswen tenses on a common propertn line. Code requires pd in., applicant protides 18 ill Section 1 "(1211t(D) Vote The fence on the cast side of properts was filled I i in. hom the propcm Mt. His explained that since the lease has been inswlled he has heen abbe to naintmil the eaiss betssecn the tico Icoc6 and hChCyCs there is adequate clearance. Ms. Patton asked Mr. AA iIlse that Ile mentioned he usuallc li lhms the peek( -inch standard totin betsseen propem lines. hossecer Ilett hate been three cases in s iol ition of the required tv,ent�- tour-inch septation and asked it he has um resulullonx_ Air. AA illsc explained that uhCN are a