Laserfiche WebLink
community attraction. During the question and answer session, the applicant described the positive <br />community reaction to similar signage at their theater in Michigan. emphasizing its nostalgic and <br />iconic appeal. Concerns were raised about potential distraction to drivers, but the applicant noted <br />previous experience with signage along high -traffic roads without issues. They clarified that the <br />sign would be turned off when the theater closes and described the sequential lighting pattern of <br />the sign, similar to the one from their childhood memory. <br />Mr. Rahm motioned to approve 80-2024: seconded by Ms. Patton. <br />During the discussion board members expressed positive sentiments about the presentation, <br />reminiscing about childhood memories of similar iconic signage. They saw the retro design as a <br />cornerstone to the shopping center's redevelopment, aligning with the city"s vision. They praised <br />the design as classy an appreciated the investment in the project. <br />Motion Passed: 4-0 <br />67-2024; Catherine Michael; 26532 Lorain Road <br />The applicant, based in Seattle, Washington, seeks variances for a lot split in the city. Variance <br />one is for frontage for Lot 1, the Ashley Furniture Shopping Center. with a request of 49.01 feet. <br />Variance two pertains to the size of the parcel, which is currently 27,150 square feet, below the <br />required minimum of 30,000 square feet. The property fell into financial distress, and splitting <br />the lots provides flexibility for the owner. The city engineer ensures access is not inhibited for <br />either parcel. The applicant couldn't attend in person due to the distance but provided <br />correspondence and REA documentation to address concerns. The lot split request is unusual. <br />creating two nonconforming lots due to historical development quirks. The areas layout poses <br />challenges, with unclear road/driveway delineations. Despite typically rejecting similar requests. <br />this scenario's proximity to minimum lot size and practical considerations make it reasonable to <br />approve the lot split. The past's planning errors necessitate current corrective action for <br />economic viability and development ease. If all easements are addressed, allowing the split <br />seems appropriate to resolve the situation. <br />Mr. Rahm motioned to approve 67-2024. seconded by Ms. Patton. <br />Motion Passed: 4-0 <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />Mr. Rahm motioned to excuse Mr. Kovach: seconded by Ms. Patton. all in favor none opposed. <br />ith no furthe business be r the board the meeting journed at 8:20 p.m. <br />Bob Papotto, C it Lvn Wilson, Administrative Assistant <br />Approved: ��� <br />