10/07/2024 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

link or solid wood, would not be aesthetically pleasing and supported the applicant's case, stating that the property's uniqueness justified the variance. Another member also expressed support, recognizing the hardship faced by the applicant, particularly with children and pets. They stated that they would feel the same way if in the applicant's position. A third member acknowledged that, in other cases, wire mesh fences might not be supported due to visibility from the street, which had previously led to complaints. However, given the secluded nature of the property and the rights of property owners to en j oy their land, this member also expressed support for the variance. Motion Passed: 4-0 133-2024; Kevin Fitzpatrick; 3868 Clague Rd. Representative: Kevin Fitzpatrick; 3868 Clague Rd. A variance request was made for a storage building, seeking an 88 -square -foot variance. The code allowed for a 200 -square -foot storage building, but the applicant proposed a 288 -square - foot structure, measuring 12 feet by 24 feet. The lot size was 23,850 square feet, a little over half an acre. The applicant explained that the need for the storage building arose from having four cars and two children, with limited space for storage. The goal was to avoid creating a parking lot in the front yard and to better utilize the available space. There was mention that the code provided context, noting that the city had previously set guidelines for storage buildings based on lot size, with larger properties allowed larger structures. The applicant clarified that an existing shed would not be demolished until approval was granted for the new building, which would be positioned slightly further from the property line. Further questions included whether a concrete drive would be added to the storage building. The applicant confirmed that only a foundation would be added, and there would be no new driveway. In response to a question about the need for the additional 88 square feet, the applicant explained that the dimensions were chosen based on cost-effectiveness, as most of the work would be done personally. The extra space would accommodate various tools and equipment, including a riding mower, snow blower, and other yard items, all of which currently occupied space in the garage. The applicant also noted that a concrete pad already existed on the site, which would serve as the entryway for the storage building. Mr. Kovach motioned to approve 133-2024; Kevin Fitzpatrick; 3868 Clague Rd.; socnonded by Ms. Patton. 3