10/07/2024 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

" Y The variance request was discussed, and it was acknowledged as a small request with a clear hardship. The applicant needed more space due to running out of room, and it was noted that storage sheds come in various sizes, requiring a larger one in this case. The need for the variance was understood, and there was support for the request. One board member had no objection, noting that the lot was large enough for the variance and that the size of the variance was reasonable given the lot size. Another member agreed but pointed out that while the variance was sizable, it was mainly a consideration of the lot's location, as the requested variance represented nearly 50% of the allowed size, which was a significant amount. Motion passed: 4-0 162-2024; Emil Morad; 5536 Columbia Rd. Representatives: Emil Morad, Nancy Young, William Rochelle, Lynn Schulte, Earl Schulte The project involved a variance request for an attached garage, where the applicant sought approval for a 2,202 square -foot variance, as the code allowed only 750 square feet. The applicant's existing garage was 552 square feet, with an additional 1,200 square -foot addition in 2007. The applicant planned to expand the garage to a total of 2,952 square feet. The property was 74,784 square feet in size. The applicant explained that he needed the space to store his five show cars and three trucks, as well as to protect them from damage, such as a raccoon that had destroyed one of his cars. He mentioned the difficulties with insurance and his limited mobility as a disabled veteran. Neighbors expressed mixed opinions. Some were supportive, noting the large lot and well- maintained property, while others raised concerns about the garage's size and the impact on their views. One neighbor opposed the addition, citing the large size of the garage and the impact on their property value, while another questioned the applicant's search for alternative storage solutions. City staff reviewed the property's history, noting a prior addition did not require a variance, but this new request would bring the garage size to nearly 3,000 square feet. The applicant suggested installing a privacy fence to mitigate the visual impact. Board members considered factors like the character of the neighborhood, the variance's substantiality, and whether the applicant's needs could be met in another way. The applicant clarified that alternatives such as renting storage space had not worked due to distance and safety concerns, particularly after prior incidents of car theft. After extensive discussion, the board considered the applicant's case and the neighbors' concerns before moving to a decision. Mr. Kovach motioed to approve 162-2024; Emil Morad; 5536 Columbia; seconded by Ms. Patton. M