Laserfiche WebLink
controlled intersection and could be a logical spot for a bus to stop. The developer also <br />highlighted the importance of ensuring there is enough space for the bus to stop safely without <br />obstructing traffic, especially given the size of the bus. <br />A suggestion was made for a designated waiting area for parents and children, possibly on the <br />north side of the park, to avoid any safety issues as buses navigate through the area. <br />The meeting then moved toward finalizing the approval process for the development, with a <br />motion made to recommend approval to the city council. The motion was seconded, and the floor <br />was opened for comments from the Planning and Design Commission before a final vote was <br />taken. <br />In this part of the meeting, concerns about traffic and the potential negative impact of the <br />development on existing streets came to the forefront. One member voiced frustration that <br />residents had already expressed their concerns to the city council but felt unheard, especially <br />regarding traffic issues. They emphasized that while the development itself might be a good <br />concept, the additional traffic generated by over 300 homes could exacerbate existing problems, <br />particularly with speeding and the lack of traffic controls on nearby streets like Hampton, Devon, <br />and Berkshire. <br />Another member echoed these concerns, acknowledging that while they were in favor of the <br />development in principle, the connected nature of the development and its potential to become a <br />cut -through for traffic could create significant issues. They suggested that a more extensive <br />traffic study, considering the broader impacts beyond just the development, might be necessary. <br />There was a suggestion that the applicant might be willing to provide a traffic impact analysis as <br />part of the final plan approval, which could help address these concerns. Despite the traffic <br />issues, there was strong support for the style and location of the new housing and the attention to <br />maintaining trees in the area. However, the traffic problem remained a key concern. <br />Mr. David motioned to recommend approval to City Council the preliminary plan for 229-2025; <br />Triban Investments LLC, 28963 Tudor Dr. with the following conditions: <br />1. The developer to give a detail on the trip generation and a traffic impact analysis <br />2. The developer submits the HOA agreement with the final plan <br />Seconded by Mr. Leon. <br />Motion Passed: 4-1 <br />Mall Area Mixed Use Overlay District <br />The project, which started about two to two and a half years ago with the Lorain Road corridor <br />plan, focused on evaluating the future of the mall. The city applied for and received a grant from <br />the Cuyahoga County Planning Commission, which typically offers professional planning <br />services at a reduced cost. The planning commission chair had been involved throughout the <br />process. The proposal, presented as an ordinance, included a mixed-use zoning overlay and a <br />design manual, outlining guidelines for building and street design. The new zoning framework <br />aimed to make the mall more vibrant by allowing mixed uses, something not previously possible <br />