06/02/2025 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

j. 4 11.5% increase in rear yard lot coverage (from the permitted 20% to 31.5%) and a three-foot side yard setback variance (from the required five feet to two feet). The applicant explained the project was designed to provide shaded outdoor space for a 93-year- old family member with health concerns, while also accommodating frequent large family gatherings. The placement of the structure was chosen due to practical constraints, including an existing pool and safety concerns related to visibility and access. The applicant noted the presence of privacy fencing and stated that immediate neighbors supported the project, with one providing a written letter of support. The building department confirmed the rear yard coverage rule is a relatively recent change, and that the proposed structure presented no drainage or maintenance issues. Staff and board members praised the quality of the applicant's presentation. No objections were raised by board members or staff. A motion to approve the variances was made by Mr. Mackey and seconded by Ms. Galateanu. The board unanimously approved the request, 5-0. 271-2025; Build the Pho; 4954 Great Northern Blvd. Unit 400 Representative: Tim Gates, Eric Weng The board reviewed a variance request for case 271-2025 regarding signage for a commercial unit at 4954 Great Northern Boulevard, Unit 400. The applicant requested a 23-square-foot variance for a sign on the secondary fagade, exceeding the 8-square-foot limit allowed by code. The proposed sign measured 31 square feet. A representative of the mall landlord presented on behalf of the business, explaining that due to the building's location, visibility from nearby roads was limited. The larger signage was encouraged to improve legibility and attract customers. The building department and board members acknowledged the unique layout of the mall, the deep setback from roads, and historical precedent for similarly sized signs on that side of the property. The business owner arrived later and briefly stated the goal was to improve visibility and customer awareness. The board found the request reasonable given the circumstances and potential hardship related to limited visibility. A motion to approve the variance was made by Mr. Mackey and seconded by Ms. Galateanu. The board unanimously approved the request, 5-0. ADJOURNMENT With no further business before the board, the meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m. 4